摘要
我国引入美国法上的版权"避风港"制度已近二十年,这一制度的建立对于免除网络服务提供者的严格责任和促进优质内容的传播具有积极的意义。但是,避风港制度的运行过程中出现了通知的滥用和反通知机制被架空的实际情况。我国在引入该制度时并不完全和充分,学界对通知-删除机制往往给予更多的关注,反通知机制的研究者并不多。客观评价该制度在美国和我国的实际运行情况,才能找到其中的制度性障碍并予以回应。适逢我国《著作权法》进行第三次修改,避风港制度中的反通知机制应在此原有的法律框架下作出适时性调整,并注意与通知-删除机制的衔接与协调,更好地发挥该制度的作用和价值。
It has been nearly 20 years since our country introduced the"safe-harbor"system of U.S.The establishment of this system has positive significance for eliminating the strict responsibility of network service providers and promoting the dissemination of quality content.However,in the course of the operation of the safe haven system,there have been actual situations in which notification of abuses and counter-notifications have been emptied.China’s introduction of this system is not complete and sufficient.Academic circles often pay more attention to the notice-takedown mechanism.There are not many researchers who have focused on counter-notice mechanisms.Objectively evaluating the actual operation of the system in the United States and China will help to find the institutional obstacles and respond to them.Coinciding with the third revision of the Copyright Law of China,the counter-notice mechanism in the safe-harbor system should make timely adjustments under this original legal framework and pay attention to the convergence and coordination with the notice-takedown mechanism in order to play better role of the system.
出处
《私法》
2019年第2期216-231,共16页
Private Law Review
基金
陕西省教育厅2019年度专项科学研究计划项目“数据产品的法律属性及侵权规则研究”(19JK0871).
关键词
避风港
通知-删除
反通知
Safe-harbor
Notice-takedown
Counter-notice
作者简介
孙那(1986—),西北政法大学经济法学院讲师,中国社科院与腾讯公司联合培养博士后,北京大学法学博士,主要研究方向为知识产权法、娱乐法。
