摘要
20世纪初古史重建思潮中,傅斯年主张扩张史料范围,突破以文字史料为主的局面,建立“整个的观点”,也即囊括传世及出土文献、考古材料在内的新史料观。进而强调出土文献及古史研究中的考古学视角,提出“地下知识,重过文字”论,突破较为重视文献的“古史辨”、“二重证据法”,并引领主要依据考古材料,而非文字文献记载来重建古史之潮流。此观点也揭示出土文献研究中考古学视角的重要性,在当下仍有其意义。
In the trend of ancient history reconstruction in the early 20th century,Fu Sinian advocated expanding the scope of historical materials,breaking through the situation dominated by written historical materials,and establishing a“whole view”,that is,a new view of historical materials including handed-down and unearthed documents and archaeological materials.Furthermore,it emphasizes the archaeological perspective of unearthed documents and ancient history research,puts forward the theory of“underground knowledge is more important than text”,breaks through the“ancient history discrimination”and“double evidence method”that attach more importance to documents,and leads the trend of reconstruction of ancient history mainly based on archaeological materials rather than written documents.This view also reveals the importance of the archaeological perspective in the study of excavated documents,which is still of significance at present.
出处
《思想与文化》
2022年第2期317-332,共16页
Thought & Culture
基金
国家社科基金青年项目“清华简与商周军事地理研究(18CZS006)”
关键词
傅斯年
王国维
二重证据法
突破
Fu Sinian
Wang Guowei
Double evidence method
breakthrough
作者简介
熊贤品(1986—),男,湖北鄂州人,历史学博士,苏州大学社会学院历史系副教授,主要研究领域为先秦史。
