摘要
2019年8月7日,中美等46个国家作为首批签约国签署了《新加坡调解公约》,公约赋予和解协议强制执行力、强调自愿原则、关注调解员和调解准则等。公约签署后,如何在国内建立更符合公约精神的多元化的调解机制,更有效、更自主地解决跨境商事纠纷,已成为当务之急。本文从三个角度对上述问题提出建议:第一、立法完善国际商事和解协议的执行审查标准与调解员守则,统一国内和解协议与国际商事和解协议的效力和执行问题;第二、除了传统的评价式调解之外,立法上应当增加促进式调解,并在调解人、调解流程、调解收费等方面,建立多元化的调解制度;第三、吸取国际经验,完善保密制度。
46 countries,including China and the United States,signed the Convention on International Settlement Agreements Resulting from Mediation as the first group of signatories on August 7,2019.Besides emphasizing the principle of voluntary,this Convention empowers the enforceability of reconciliation agreements and puts emphasis on mediators or mediation guidelines.After signing of the Convention,it is urgent to establish a pluralistic mediation mechanism which is more in accordance with the spirit of the Convention in order to resolve cross-border commercial disputes more effectively and democratically.This paper puts forward suggestions on the above issues from three perspectives.First,implementation review standards and mediator guidance of international commercial reconciliation agreements should be improved by legislation.Additionally,it is necessary to resolve the conflict of domestic commercial reconciliation agreements and international commercial reconciliation agreements from perspectives of effectiveness and enforceability.Second,in addition to the traditional evaluative mediation,promoting mediation should be codified.A comprehensive mediation mechanism should be established in terms of mediators,mediation process,and mediation fees.Third,international experience is worth referring to in order to develop our confidentiality mechanism.
出处
《商事仲裁与调解》
2021年第1期59-75,共17页
Commercial Arbitration & Mediation
关键词
评价式
促进式
保密
多元化
evaluation
promotion
confidentiality
pluralism
作者简介
詹秦,广东莱特律师事务所律师。
