摘要
通过仲裁程序解决争议以当事人达成仲裁协议为前提。根据现行法律规定,主合同的仲裁条款无法扩张适用于从合同。实践中,确实导致主合同、从合同无法在同一仲裁程序中得到全面、高效地审理和解决,因此仲裁效力扩张论的支持者主张应当赋予主合同仲裁条款扩张适用于从合同的效力,该观点亦在《仲裁法(修订)(征求意见稿)》中有所体现。笔者认为,主合同仲裁条款在一定情形下扩张适用于从合同有其现实需求及合理性,但仍应当尊重当事人意思自治,如果从合同当事人明确约定选择诉讼方式解决争议,则不宜将主合同仲裁条款直接扩张适用于从合同的当事人。
The resolution of disputes through arbitration proceedings is based on the premise that the parties have reached an arbitration agreement.According to current laws and regulations,the arbitration clause of the principal contract cannot be expanded to apply to the collateral contract,which in practice,makes the principal contract and the collateral contract unable to be fully and efficiently trialed and resolved in one arbitration proceeding.Therefore,the proponents of the expansion theory of arbitration argue that the arbitration clause of the principal contract should be expanded and applied to the collateral contract,which is reflected in the Arbitration Law(Revision)(Draft for Comments).The author believes the theory that expanding and applying the arbitration clause of the principal contract to the collateral contract under certain circumstances has its practical requirements and rationality,but the parties’autonomy should be respected.If the parties to the contract specifically agree to choose litigation to resolve disputes,it is not appropriate to apply the principal contract arbitration clause directly to the parties to the collateral contract.
出处
《商事仲裁与调解》
2022年第1期97-105,共9页
Commercial Arbitration & Mediation
关键词
仲裁
管辖
效力扩张
意思自治
arbitration
jurisdiction of arbitration
validity expansion
autonomy of will
作者简介
王伟斌,上海市锦天城律师事务所高级合伙人;邱冬梅,上海市锦天城律师事务所律师。
