摘要
随着全社会对仲裁透明度要求的不断提高,不少国际仲裁机构选择公开仲裁员回避决定。SCC自1995年以来,率先在经过保密处理后逐步公开了回避的事由、双方的观点以及仲裁机构的推理过程。对SCC在1995年至2019年公开的仲裁员回避案件进行实证分析显示:在程序规则方面,SCC已形成较为良好的兼顾效率与公平的体系;在实体规则方面,SCC形成了“公正性”“独立性”和“合理怀疑”三要素组成的一般性规则,以及“整体考虑”“个案因素”和“最佳仲裁实践”组成的具体规则。我国应结合具体国情,适时公开附有理由的回避决定,并形成具有中国特色的仲裁员回避规则体系。
With the continuous improvement for transparency in arbitration,many international arbitration institutes choose to publish decisions on the challenges to arbitrators.SCC has been the first to gradually disclose the grounds,the arguments of parties,and the reasoning process since 1995.An empirical analysis of challenges to arbitrators disclosed by SCC from 1995 to 2019 shows that,in terms of procedural rules,SCC has formed a relatively good system that takes efficiency and fairness into account;in terms of substantive rules,SCC has formed general rules consisting of impartiality,independence and reasonable doubt,as well as specific rules consisting of holistic consideration,case factors and best arbitration practices.China should take into account its particular circumstances,timely and appropriately disclose the reasoned challenge decision,and form rules of challenge to arbitrators in the Chinese context.
出处
《商事仲裁与调解》
2022年第2期10-24,共15页
Commercial Arbitration & Mediation
关键词
回避
公正性
独立性
合理怀疑
整体考虑
challenge
impartiality
independence
reasonable doubt
holistic consideration
作者简介
胡海容,重庆理工大学重庆知识产权学院教授,重庆仲裁委员会仲裁员。
