摘要
"边疆建构论"将边疆概念放在建构主义的框架思考问题,但基于对"边疆"本身的理解,人们将"边疆"置于不同的时代和国家形态下加以阐释是存在不足的,因为"边疆建构论"有固有的逻辑前提。作为一种人类活动的空间综合体和国家版图空间功能分工的载体,以及主权和领土的构成要件,边疆及其边疆功能的存在使得"边疆实在论"有了核心。因为,边界是边疆的构成要素,是"线",呈现"线状"分布,而边疆是"面",呈现"带状"分布。在"王朝国家"形态下,通常是有"边疆"而无"边界",而在"民族国家"形态下,国家与国家之间的边界是清晰的,边疆与边界是一对孪生兄弟,有"边界"就有"边疆"。"边疆建构论"将边疆的存在与国家的大小联系起来,暴露了其理论的弱点;在这一点上,恰好为"边疆实在论"提供了注脚。
"Border Constructivism"has come out based on the framework of constructivism;however,"border"is problematic concept because there were or are"border’’forms at different times and in different countries and because"Border Constructivism"has its own inherent logic premise.On the contrary,"Border Realism"will be considered to be a theory opposite to"Border Constructivism"based on the fact that border is functionally a kind of space for complex human activity,the carrier of national territorial space,and,for that matter,an important component of national sovereignty.A boundary is a"line"of"linear"distribution which is regarded as an element of a"border",but"border"is an"area",a"strip"distribution.In a dynastic form of state,there was usually a"border"without a definite"boundary",but for the modern"nation states",boundary lines between countries must be clear and definite,as border and boundary are like"twin brothers".One weakness of"Border Constructivism"is that it establishes the linkage between the existence of the border and the size of the country,which"Border Constructivism"has avoided.
作者
杨明洪
YANG Ming-hong(The Faculty of Social Development and Western China Development Studies,Sichuan University,Chengdu Sichuan 610064)
出处
《新疆师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第1期133-144,共12页
Journal of Xinjiang Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基金
国家社科基金重大项目“十八大以来党中央‘治边稳藏’战略思想的理论体系研究”(16ZZD051)的阶段性成果.
关键词
边疆
建构论
实在论
批评
Border
Constructivism
Realism
Criticism
作者简介
杨明洪,四川大学社会发展与西部开发研究院教授。
