期刊文献+

从“阶梯式治理”走向“协同治理”——我国虚假仲裁治理的另一种思路 被引量:3

From “Stepped Governance” to “Coordinated Governance”——Another Way to Deal with False Arbitration in China
原文传递
导出
摘要 虚假仲裁治理是仲裁机构和司法机关共同面临的重大理论与实践课题。我国虚假仲裁治理虽已形成了以仲裁机构、人民法院和检察机关为主体,以民事责任、刑事责任为手段的"阶梯式治理"体制,但这一体制由于单个机制的固有缺陷,尚无法满足虚假仲裁治理的需求。鉴于此,为克服单个机制所固有的缺陷,需要围绕虚假仲裁治理的目标,构建虚假仲裁治理的协同机制,提升协同机制的制度化水平,实现虚假仲裁治理由"阶梯式治理"到"协同治理"的转变。 The governance of false arbitration is an important theoretical and practical issue faced by arbitration institutions and judicial organs.Although the current false arbitration governance has formed a"Stepped Governance"system with arbitration institutions,people’s courts and procuratorial organs as the subjects and civil and criminal liability as the means,this system cannot meet the needs of false arbitration governance due to the inherent defects of single mechanism.In view of this,in order to overcome the inherent defects of a single mechanism,we need to build a collaborative mechanism of false arbitration around the goal of governance of false arbitration,improve the level of institutionalization of collaborative mechanism,and realize the transformation from"Stepped Governance"to"Coordinated governance".
作者 牛鹏 Niu Peng
机构地区 武汉大学法学院
出处 《仲裁研究》 2021年第1期45-52,共8页 Arbitration Study
关键词 虚假仲裁 阶梯式治理 司法审查 协同治理 False Arbitration Stepped Governance Judicial Review Coordinated Governance
作者简介 牛鹏,武汉大学法学院博士研究生。
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献37

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部