期刊文献+

游乐场上的融合:残疾儿童游戏权的“合法律性”及“合教育性”论证 被引量:10

Inclusive Play:“Legal”and“Educational”Demonstrations of Disabled Children’s Right to Play
原文传递
导出
摘要 国际法和国内法规定了残疾儿童游戏权的具体内容、残疾儿童游戏权的国家义务,从而为残疾儿童游戏权的正当性提供了法理依据和外部证成。然而,仍有必要从残疾儿童成长的内部视野开展其游戏权的“合教育性”论证,游戏是残疾儿童作为人的本体存在的基本需要、游戏对残疾儿童成长具有重要价值、游戏是残疾儿童经验建构和社会融合的实践路径,以上构成了残疾儿童游戏权证立的教育学理依据。因而,残疾儿童的游戏权具有“合法律性”及“合教育性”两个层面的正当性和合理性,社会、大众和教育者应对残疾儿童的游戏权予以认可,并采取各种措施尊重、保护和落实残疾儿童的游戏权。 International conventions and domestic laws stipulate the specific contents of disabled children’s right to play as well as the obligations and responsibilities of the states to guarantee the right.However,it is still necessary to carry out educational demonstration of disabled children’s right to play from the perspective of their growth,the play is the ontological needs of disabled children,is of great value to their physical and mental growth,is a practical path of their experience construction and social integration,which constitute the educational theoretical basis for the establishment of disabled children’s right to play.Therefore,there are“legal”aspect and“educational”aspect of legitimacy and rationality of disabled children’s right to play,which the public and educators should recognize and take measures to respect and protect.
作者 李方璐 刘智成 LI Fanglu;LIU Zhicheng(Faculty of Education,East China Normal University,Shanghai,200062;College of Education,Jiangxi Normal University,Nanchang,330022)
出处 《中国特殊教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第5期21-27,共7页 Chinese Journal of Special Education
关键词 残疾儿童 游戏权 权利证成 合法律性 合教育性 包容性游戏 disabled children right to play legal reasoning legal educational inclusive play
作者简介 通讯作者:李方璐,讲师,博士生,研究方向:特殊儿童心理与教育。E-mail:lifanglu.ecnu@qq.com。
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献39

  • 1李富金.地方法院无权发布司法解释性文件[J].法学,1998(2):60-61. 被引量:4
  • 2周道鸾.论司法解释及其规范化[J].中国法学,1994(1):88-97. 被引量:56
  • 3严存生.法的合法性问题研究[J].法律科学,2002,20(3):3-14. 被引量:76
  • 4王洪平,房绍坤.民事习惯的动态法典化——民事习惯之司法导入机制研究[J].法制与社会发展,2007,13(1):82-94. 被引量:43
  • 5W. JethroBrown. Customary Low in Modern England. Columbia Law Review, Vol. 5, No. 8, (Dec. , 1905), pp. 570-575.
  • 6Derek Asiedu-Akrofi. Judicial Recognition and Adoption of Customary Law in Nigeria. The American Journal of Comparative law,Vol. 37, No. 3, (Summer, 1989), pp. 571-593.
  • 7Lindesay J. Robertson. The Judicial Recognition of Custom in India. Journal of Comparative Legislation and International Law, ThirdSeries, Vol. 4, No. 4 (1922), pp. 218-228.
  • 8E. S. Haydon. The Choice of Chinese Customary Law in Hong Kong. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol, 11, No. 1, (Jan., 1962), p. 232.
  • 9D. J. lewis. A Requiem for Chinese Customary law in Hong Kong. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 32, No. 2, (Apr., 1983), pp. 347-356.
  • 10黄源盛.《民初大理院民事审判法源问题再探》,载李贵连主编.《近代法研究》,北京:北京大学出版社,2007年,第8页.

共引文献209

同被引文献260

引证文献10

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部