摘要
1996年《行政处罚法》第24条确立了“一事一罚”的行政罚款适用规则,但如何适用却是争议不断。2021年修改的《行政处罚法》第29条增加了“同一个违法行为违反多个法律规范应当给予罚款处罚的,按照罚款数额高的规定处罚”一句,确立了“择一重罚”的行政罚款适用规则。“一事一罚”中的“一事”是同一个违法行为,应以构成要件为认定标准,“一罚”是“罚款”,分别有基本模式、法条竞合和想像竞合三种适用情形;“择一重罚”中“择一”是在多个法律规范中选择其中一个适用,“重罚”是最高额罚款。“择一重罚”仅适用于想像竞合情形。
Article 24 of the 1996 Administrative Penalty Law established the rule of“one punishment for one matter”,but how to apply it is a constant controversy.Article 29 of the Administrative Penalty Law amended in 2021,added that“Where a penalty of fine shall be imposed upon as the same illegal act violates several laws and regulations,penalty shall be given according to the provisions on higher fine”,which establishes the applicable rule of administrative fines of“higher fine chosen”.The“one fine”in the“One illegal act one penalty of fine”is the same violation of the law,the composition elements should be identified as the standard,“a penalty”is“fine”,there are three applicable circumstances,respectively,the basic model,overlap of legal provisions and imaginative concurrence.The“choose one”in“higher fine chosen”is in a number of legal norms to choose one of the application,the“heavy penalty”is the maximum fine.The“higher fine chosen”is only applicable to imaginative concurrence.
出处
《政法论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第4期18-28,共11页
Tribune of Political Science and Law
关键词
行政处罚
一事一罚
择一重罚
法条竞合
想像竞合
Administrative Penalty
One Illegal Act One Penalty of Fine
Higher Fine Chosen
Overlap of Legal Provisions
Imaginative Concurrence
作者简介
章剑生,浙江大学光华法学院教授。
