摘要
马克思在《莱茵报》时期所遭遇的对物质利益发表意见的难事,并不能简单归结为缺少政治经济学知识,因为这些难事即使借助当时的政治经济学理论也不可能得到令人满意的解答。以"林木盗窃法问题"为例,在不触动现代社会所建立于其上的私人所有权的前提下,马克思事实上不可能为自己当时主要基于道德直觉的立场辩护。只有在洞悉普遍贫困在现代社会的结构性根源及其所包含的结构不正义,并转向对现代社会的经济结构的基础性批判之后,这些难事才有可能得到一个根本的解答。
The difficulties that Marx encountered in expressing his opinions on material interests when he worked for Rheinische Zeitung cannot be simply attributed to his lack of knowledge of political economy,for these difficulties cannot be satisfactorily resolved by contemporary theories of political economy.In the case of the debate over the law against wood-theft,Marx could not defend his position,which was based largely on his moral intuition,without rejecting the private property on which modern society was built.Only after discovering the structural origin of general poverty in modern society and the structural injustice it contains,and therefore turning to a basic criticism of the social economic structure,could these difficulties be solved fundamentally.
出处
《哲学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第3期16-25,128,共11页
Philosophical Research
基金
国家社会科学基金重大项目“基于MEGA2的马克思早期文本研究”(编号15ZDB001)的阶段性成果
