常人方法论与科学社会学研究传统的继承创新被引量：5

On the Ethnomethodology School and Innovation of Research Tradition in Sociology of Science

在线阅读下载PDF

导出

摘要建构主义观点由于激进地宣称科学知识是社会建构的,而引致了先验的社会决定论与具体的经验证实性之间的方法论尴尬。内部认识的"混乱"、"支离破碎的纲领"及经验研究的不足可视为当前科学知识社会学发展困境的鲜明体现。但社会学家迈克尔·林奇(Michael Lynch)的解决方案是倡导一种后分析的常人方法论(Ethnomethodology)纲领,他坚持对科学实践的经验描述,按照"方法的唯一适用性要求"研究每一案例,从而提供了一种对常人方法论和科学社会学自身所适用的创新发展之路。 Constructivism perspectives have fell into the methodological embarrassment of transcendental social determinism and concrete empirical confirmation, because of their radical claim that scientific knowledge is socially constructed. Internal understanding ＂chaos＂, ＂fragmentary programs＂ and short of empirical study can be regarded as the troublesome state of the current sociology of scientific knowledge development. However, Michael Lynch＇s solution is to advocate a postanalytic etbnometbodology program, insisting on the empirical description of scientific practice, and investigating each case in accordance with a unique adequacy requirement. Thereby be provides an innovative study program suitable for ethnomethodology and sociology of science.

作者马光川林聚任

机构地区山东大学哲学与社会发展学院潍坊学院

出处《科学与社会》 CSSCI 2015年第1期59-71,共13页 Science and Society

关键词常人方法论新科学社会学研究传统创新 ethnomethodology, new sociology of science, research tradition, Innovation

分类号 G301 [文化科学]

作者简介马光川，山东大学哲学与社会发展学院博士研究生。研究方向为社会发展与社会保障、科学社会学。林聚任，山东大学哲学与社会发展学院社会学系教授，博士生导师。研究方向为科学社会学、社会学理论。

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献20

1Karin Knorr-Cetina and Michael Mulkay(eds. ). Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Studies of Science. London: Sage Publication, 1983: 7.
2Greg Myers. Sociology of Science without the Sociology. Social Studies of Science, 1990,20(3): 559--563.
3T. F. Gieryn. Relativist/Constructivist Programmes in the Sociology of Science: Redundance and Retreat. Social Studies of Science, 1982,12(2) :279--297.
4Edward J. Hackett(eds. ). The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies(Third Edition). Cambridge, Mass. : The MIT Press, 2008:1.
5Steve Shapin. Here and Everywhere: Sociology of Scientific Knowledge. Annual Re- view of Sociology, 1995,21 : 289--321.
6Michael Lynch. Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action: Ethnomethodology and So- cial Studies of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1993.
7Sergio Sismondo. Science and Technology Studies and an Engaged Program. In Edward J. Haekett(eds. ). The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies(Third Edition). Cambridge, Mass. : The MIT Press, 2008:17.
8H. Collins. Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice. Chica- go: The University of Chicago Press, 1992: 185--186.
9B.巴恩斯,D.布鲁尔,鲁旭东.相对主义、理性主义和知识社会学[J].哲学译丛,2000(1):5-15. 被引量：32
10Andrew Piekering. The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency and Science. Chicago University of Chicago Press, 1995.

二级参考文献36

1哈丽特.朱可曼,李传实,马亭亭.科学社会学五十年(续1)[J].山东科技大学学报（社会科学版）,2004,6(3):1-14. 被引量：6
2哈丽特·朱可曼 ,刘新刚 ,王硕鹏 ,马亭亭.科学社会学五十年(续完)[J].山东科技大学学报（社会科学版）,2004,6(4):1-16. 被引量：3
3成素梅.拉图尔的科学哲学观——在巴黎对拉图尔的专访[J].哲学动态,2006(9):3-8. 被引量：43
4Ashmore,M. 1989. The Reflexive Thesis: Wrighting Sociology of Scientific Knowledge. Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.
5Bloor, D. 1991(2^nd).Knowledge and Social Imagery.Chicago and London:The University of Chicago Press.
6Bourdieu,Eand L.Wacquant 1992.An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.
7Bourdieu,P.2004.Science of Science and Reflexivity.Cambridge:Polity Press.
8Doran,Chris. 1989. "Grasping Reflexivity." Social Studies of Science 19:755-759.
9Gillbert, GN.and M.Mulkay 1984.Opening Pandora's Box:A Sociological Analysis of Scientists" Discourse. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
10Knorr-Cetina, K. 1981. The Manufacture of Knowledge. Oxford:Pergamon.