The evolution and development of Searle’s philosophy of mind can be divided into two important stages,i.e.the origin and beginning stage between 1960sand 1970s,the formation and development stage since 1980s.Searle’...The evolution and development of Searle’s philosophy of mind can be divided into two important stages,i.e.the origin and beginning stage between 1960sand 1970s,the formation and development stage since 1980s.Searle’s Speech Act Theory started the research on philosophy of mind,which is considered as the origin of his philosophy of mind.The Theories of Intentionality and Chinese Room Argument are the most important and most influential academic findings in his research in the field of philosophy of mind,which lay a solid theoretical foundation for the formation and development of his theories of philosophy of mind.Searle’s philosophy of mind finds wide prospect in the research field,which provides a new direction to understand the world and probe into mind,proposes a new perspective and methodology for the study of language,and promotes the new development of the study of language.展开更多
On naming two theories can be found in the philosophy of language research field,descriptive theory and historical casual theory.For the former,characteristics of social entities are fundamentally fore-grounded in the...On naming two theories can be found in the philosophy of language research field,descriptive theory and historical casual theory.For the former,characteristics of social entities are fundamentally fore-grounded in the process of naming,for the latter social context changes taken into account.Social contexts exert the same influence on the initial naming and the renaming of social entities over time with the same mechanism,conforming to certain social conventions and filtering the unwanted and presenting the value-added judgments.Both the naming and renaming of objects involve the judgments given to the entities in society.Hereby it is safe to say that under no case shall language use be value-free and that name variants mirror social contexts developments.展开更多
基金funded by the Postgraduate English Education and Teaching Research Project of Chongqing Education Commission in 2012(No.yjg123080)
文摘The evolution and development of Searle’s philosophy of mind can be divided into two important stages,i.e.the origin and beginning stage between 1960sand 1970s,the formation and development stage since 1980s.Searle’s Speech Act Theory started the research on philosophy of mind,which is considered as the origin of his philosophy of mind.The Theories of Intentionality and Chinese Room Argument are the most important and most influential academic findings in his research in the field of philosophy of mind,which lay a solid theoretical foundation for the formation and development of his theories of philosophy of mind.Searle’s philosophy of mind finds wide prospect in the research field,which provides a new direction to understand the world and probe into mind,proposes a new perspective and methodology for the study of language,and promotes the new development of the study of language.
基金Science and Technology Innovation Fund of Nanjing Forestry University(X09-102-1)2011 Annual University Guidance Program of Philosophy and Social Science from Jiangsu Provincial Education Department(2011SJD740019)
文摘On naming two theories can be found in the philosophy of language research field,descriptive theory and historical casual theory.For the former,characteristics of social entities are fundamentally fore-grounded in the process of naming,for the latter social context changes taken into account.Social contexts exert the same influence on the initial naming and the renaming of social entities over time with the same mechanism,conforming to certain social conventions and filtering the unwanted and presenting the value-added judgments.Both the naming and renaming of objects involve the judgments given to the entities in society.Hereby it is safe to say that under no case shall language use be value-free and that name variants mirror social contexts developments.
