Thanks to globalization and the emergence of the digital,capitalism progressively arrives to the stage of neoliberal financial hegemony. Therefore,in Europe today,Marxism remains powerful only in the form of leftist p...Thanks to globalization and the emergence of the digital,capitalism progressively arrives to the stage of neoliberal financial hegemony. Therefore,in Europe today,Marxism remains powerful only in the form of leftist populism among the"radical left",as social-democrats and socialists have been largely absorbed by the right. However,because the struggle for hegemony is not only a binary relationship but also a triangular relationship,the only conceivable emancipation strategy is the old Marxist one,which is both dual,popular class against ruling class,and triangular,between three social forces (plus the competent). In this way,the popular class can access itself competence-power by associating with the competent and putting them under its own hegemony.展开更多
The paper looks at the issue of the relationship between Marx and Marxism. Three approaches to the issue,which are widespread in contemporary Marxist literature and among marxologists are discussed. The first approach...The paper looks at the issue of the relationship between Marx and Marxism. Three approaches to the issue,which are widespread in contemporary Marxist literature and among marxologists are discussed. The first approach: the true Marx is the philosophy of Marx minus political theory. The second approach: the true Marx is the philosophy of Marx plus political theory of social-democratic parties. The third approach: the true Marx is the philosophy of Marx plus political theory,developed most fully by Lenin in the preparation of the R ussian revolution. The third approach,from our point of view,corresponds most to the essence of genuine Marxism,at least as applied to the twentieth century. The paper examines in detail the principal novelty of Lenin speaking of the need to translate Marx's materialistic theory of history to the political level as a theoretical issue. The author also notes the contribution of the Chinese leaders into further development of the political theory of Marxism closely connected with the issues of strategy and tactics of building socialism with Chinese characteristics. In conclusion,the paper states that world history nowbecomes increasingly complex and mixed. Therefore,the question of whether Marxist philosophers in this situation will be able to find ways of realization the 11th thesis of Marx "On Feuerbach"remains open.展开更多
Both Marxism and nationalism are among the most far-reaching thoughts in modern times.On dealing the ideological collision between Marxism and nationalism, "Difficult Dialogue" universally exists in the acad...Both Marxism and nationalism are among the most far-reaching thoughts in modern times.On dealing the ideological collision between Marxism and nationalism, "Difficult Dialogue" universally exists in the academic circle.Many scholars evaded,ridiculed or even negated classic Marxist writers' explications on nationalism.Though basically,classic Marxist writers criticize nationalism,it doesn' t mean that Marxism and nationalism inevitably oppose to each other.It is highly necessary to analyze the causes of the "difficult dialogue between Marxism and nationalism" and re-thinking classic Marxist writers' explications on nationalism.展开更多
文摘Thanks to globalization and the emergence of the digital,capitalism progressively arrives to the stage of neoliberal financial hegemony. Therefore,in Europe today,Marxism remains powerful only in the form of leftist populism among the"radical left",as social-democrats and socialists have been largely absorbed by the right. However,because the struggle for hegemony is not only a binary relationship but also a triangular relationship,the only conceivable emancipation strategy is the old Marxist one,which is both dual,popular class against ruling class,and triangular,between three social forces (plus the competent). In this way,the popular class can access itself competence-power by associating with the competent and putting them under its own hegemony.
文摘The paper looks at the issue of the relationship between Marx and Marxism. Three approaches to the issue,which are widespread in contemporary Marxist literature and among marxologists are discussed. The first approach: the true Marx is the philosophy of Marx minus political theory. The second approach: the true Marx is the philosophy of Marx plus political theory of social-democratic parties. The third approach: the true Marx is the philosophy of Marx plus political theory,developed most fully by Lenin in the preparation of the R ussian revolution. The third approach,from our point of view,corresponds most to the essence of genuine Marxism,at least as applied to the twentieth century. The paper examines in detail the principal novelty of Lenin speaking of the need to translate Marx's materialistic theory of history to the political level as a theoretical issue. The author also notes the contribution of the Chinese leaders into further development of the political theory of Marxism closely connected with the issues of strategy and tactics of building socialism with Chinese characteristics. In conclusion,the paper states that world history nowbecomes increasingly complex and mixed. Therefore,the question of whether Marxist philosophers in this situation will be able to find ways of realization the 11th thesis of Marx "On Feuerbach"remains open.
基金the phased achievement of the national social science fund-Study of Classic Marxist Writers'Explications on Nationalism and Its Contemporary Significance(No:10CMZ002)the national social science fund-Important Literature's Collation and Study of Major CPC Leader'Explications on Nationalism Each Period(No.:13CMZ002)China postdoctoral science foundation-Study of Classic Marxist Writers'Nation-state Theory and Practice(No.:2014M550120)
文摘Both Marxism and nationalism are among the most far-reaching thoughts in modern times.On dealing the ideological collision between Marxism and nationalism, "Difficult Dialogue" universally exists in the academic circle.Many scholars evaded,ridiculed or even negated classic Marxist writers' explications on nationalism.Though basically,classic Marxist writers criticize nationalism,it doesn' t mean that Marxism and nationalism inevitably oppose to each other.It is highly necessary to analyze the causes of the "difficult dialogue between Marxism and nationalism" and re-thinking classic Marxist writers' explications on nationalism.
