摘要
中国是《华盛顿协议》正式成员国,以追求工程专业毕业要求的实质等效为原则。课程是毕业要求的载体和实现途径,是人才培养的四梁八柱,课程目标达成情况将直接决定着毕业要求指标点的实现。近年来,为了证明课程目标达成情况,许多专业在尝试量化课程目标达成度的评价方法,但其科学合理性值得商榷。本文提出并成功实践的面向产出的课程目标达成情况评议方法,充分考虑了主讲教师对课程目标、毕业要求的理解度,教学管理过程对课程目标达成的保障度,考核方式与考核内容对于课程目标达成的体现度,可操作性强,值得推广。
China is a full member of the Washington Agreement and pursues the principle of substantial equivalence of graduation requirements for engineering majors. Curriculum is the carrier of graduation requirements and the way to achieve it, which also is the main pillar of talent training. The achievement of curriculum objectives will directly determine the realization of graduation requirements. In recent years, in order to prove the achievement of curriculum objectives, many majors are trying to use quantitative evaluation method, but its scientific rationality is questionable. This study puts forward and successfully practices the outcomes-based evaluation method for the achievement of curriculum objectives, which fully considers the understanding degree of the lecturer to the curriculum objectives and graduation requirements, the guarantee degree of the teaching management process to the achievement of curriculum objectives, and the embodiment degree of the assessment methods and assessment contents to the achievement of curriculum objectives. The approach proposed in this study has strong operability and is worth promoting.
出处
《教育进展》
2021年第5期1831-1837,共7页
Advances in Education
