摘要
形式主义司法是从反形式主义理论中总结而来的,不存在明晰的具体概念。形式主义司法以逻辑推理为核心、强调司法自治,不与机械司法、法条主义等同,其合理内涵中包括对法律精神的尊重、对立法原意及立法目的的探析。民意审判作为一种司法实践中的现象,存在不同的称谓,判决在一定程度上借鉴了民众的价值判断就可以被称为“民意审判”。在看到民意审判正向作用的同时,也应当警惕“民愤”对司法的不当影响。反对民意审判的学者实际上反对的是民意审判中的乱象,这种乱象主要体现在新闻媒体、当事人一方、行政机关为一己之私而干预司法公正的一系列行为中。民意需要被合理甄别,且不能主宰审判,从价值衡量和实质正义的角度解释,可以论证民意审判在形式主义司法中存在适用空间。
Judicial formalism is summarized from the revolt against formalism theory, and there is no clear concrete concept. Although judicial formalism takes logical reasoning as its core and emphasizes judicial autonomy, it is not equivalent to mechanical judicature and legalism. Its reasonable connotation includes respect for the spirit of the law and analysis of the original intention and purpose of the legislation. Popular will trial, as a phenomenon in judicial practice, has different titles. The judgment can be called a “popular will trial” if it draws on the value judgment of the people to some extent. It should also be alert to the improper influence of “public anger” on the judiciary. The scholars who oppose popular will trial actually oppose the chaos in those trials, which is mainly reflected in a series of behaviors of the news media, parties to the cases and administrative agencies who interfere in judicial justice for their own selfish interests. Popular will needs to be properly screened and cannot dominate the trial. From the perspective of value measurement and substantive justice, it can be proved that public opinion trial has application space in formalistic justice.
出处
《社会科学前沿》
2024年第7期92-98,共7页
Advances in Social Sciences
