期刊文献+

体外阻断CD_(40)-CD_(40)L共刺激途径减轻小鼠异基因骨髓移植中移植物抗宿主病的研究 被引量:6

Study of reducing graft-versus-host disease by in vitro blockade of CD_(40) -CD_(40) ligand co-stimulatory pathway in allogeneic bone marrow transplantation mouse model
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 在异基因骨髓移植移植物抗宿主病 (GVHD)小鼠模型中 ,观察抗CD4 0 L单克隆抗体 (单抗 )体外预处理供鼠T细胞输注 ,观察其减轻GVHD的作用并探讨其作用机制。方法 供鼠(C5 7BL 6 H 2b)脾T细胞作为反应细胞 ,受鼠 (BALB cH 2d)脾细胞作为刺激细胞 ,分别加抗CD4 0 L单抗或不加单抗进行混合培养 ,培养第 5天的细胞作为经体外诱导后的脾T淋巴细胞 ,分别混合供鼠骨髓细胞后移植给接受 8.0Gy全身照射预处理的受鼠。比较受鼠GVHD发生和造血重建。在移植后不同时间点采用流式细胞仪检测受鼠脾细胞中T细胞表型的改变 ,用ELISA法检测外周血血清中Th1和Th2类细胞因子的水平。结果 移植后对照组受鼠均于 2 5d内死于GVHD ,实验组GVHD的发生率为2 0 % ,与对照组小鼠相比 ,存活率和存活时间明显增高和延长 (P <0 0 1) ;存活的实验组小鼠 (8只 )第4 0天时骨髓细胞中H 2Db 阳性细胞为 (93.5 4± 2 .32 ) %。实验组小鼠CD3+ CD4+ 、CD3+ CD8+ 、CD4+CD2 5+ 、CD4+ CD6 9+ 、CD8+ CD2 5+ 、CD4+ CD4 0 L+ 和CD8+ CD6 9+ T细胞比例明显低于对照组 (P <0 .0 5 ) ,CD8+ CD4 0 L+ 和CD4+ CD4 5RA+ T细胞比例在两组中变化差异无显著性 (P >0 .0 5 )。实验组受鼠血清中细胞因子水平明显低于对照组 (P <0 .0 5 )。结论 应? Objective To investigate the effect and its mechanism of reducing graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) by in vitro blockade of CD 40 -CD 40 L pathway in vitro, the donor T lymphocytes cultured in vitro with anti-CD 40 L mAb were transfused in bone marrow transplantation (BMT) GVHD mouse model. Methods C57BL/6 H-2b spleen T cells were isolated as responder cells, and BALB/c H-2d spleen cells as stimulator cells. They were cocultured with or without Anti-CD 40 L mAb as anti-CD 40 L mAb group and control group, respectively. At day 5, the mixed lymphocyte response(MLR)-culture cells mixed with bone marrow cells and transfused respectively into the TBI conditioned recipient mice. The mice were divided into two groups: group A, bone marrow cells(2×10 6) and spleen T lymphcytes(2×10 6) from MLR control group; group B, bone marrow cells(2×10 6) and spleen T lymphcytes(2×10 6) from MLR anti-CD 40 L mAb group. The GVHD incidence and hematopoietic reconstitution were observed. Peripheral blood sera and spleen cells of the recipients mice were harvested at scheduled time points for the measurement of cytokines and T cell immunophenotyping with flow cytometry. Results The incidence of GVHD in group A was 100%(10/10), and in group B was 20%(2/10). The percentage of H-2D b positive cells in group B (n=8) was (93.54±2.32)% at day 40 after transplantation. The levels of cytokines in serum from group B were significantly lower than those from group A (P<0.05). The expressions of CD 4 +, CD 8 +, CD 4 +CD 25+, CD 8 +CD 25+, CD 4 +CD 69+, CD 8 +CD 69+ and CD 4 +CD 40 L + were lower in group B than in group A (P<0.05). The expressions of CD 8 +CD 40 L + and CD 4 +CD 45RA+ were similar in the two groups(P>0.05). Conclusion Blockade of CD 40 -CD 40 L interaction in vitro could induce immune tolerance in vivo, reduce aGVHD in aGVHD mice model and form chimerism, which was mediated by inhibiting the Th1 and Th2 cytokines production, inducing tolerance of CD 4 + and CD 8 + cells to alloantigens. The obstruction of T cells activation after tolerance happened mainly at the early and mature phase of T cells activation. These provided the experimental basis for the use of anti-CD 40 L mAb in the clinical transplantation to prevent aGVHD.
出处 《中华血液学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2003年第6期290-294,共5页 Chinese Journal of Hematology
关键词 体外阻断 CD40-CD40L 异基因 骨髓移植 移植物抗宿主病 Graft-versus-host disease Immune tolerance Bone marrow transplantation,allogeneic Mouse
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1陈纯.CD40-CD40L在移植免疫中的研究进展[J].国外医学(输血及血液学分册),2001,24(3):217-220. 被引量:7
  • 2Blazar BR;Taylor PA;Panoskaltsis-Mortari A.Blockade of CD40 ligand-CD40 interaction impairs CD4+ T cell-mediated alloreactivity by inhibiting mature donor T cell expansion and function after bone marrow transplantation[J],1997.
  • 3Ito H;Kurtz J;Shaffer J.CD4 T cell-mediated allo resistance to fully MHC-mismatched allogeneic bone marrow engraftment is dependent on CD40-CD40 ligand interactions and lasting T cell tolerance is induced by bone marrow transplantation with initial blockade of this pathway[J],2001(5).
  • 4Honey K;Cobbold SP;Waldmann H.CD40 ligand blockade induces CD4+ T cell tolerance and linked suppression,1999.
  • 5Gao D;Li J;Orosz CG.Different costimulation signals used by CD4+ and CD8+ cells that independently initiate rejection of allogeneic hepatocytes in mice[J],2000.
  • 6Taylor PA;Panoskalitsis-Mortari A;Noelle RJ.Analysis of the requirements for the induction of CD4+ T cell alloantigen hyporesposiveness by ex vivo anti-CD40 ligand antibody,2000.

二级参考文献10

  • 1Jon DL,Eric C,Randol PH,et al. Critical Reviews in Immunology . 1996
  • 2Skov S,Bonyhadi M,Niels O,et al. J Immunol . 2000
  • 3Howland KC,Ausubel LJ,London CA,et al. J Immunol . 2000
  • 4Shepherd DM,Kerkvliet NI. J Immunol . 1999
  • 5Blazar BR,Korngold R,Vallera DA,et al. Immunological Reviews . 1997
  • 6Wekerle T,Sayegh MH,Hill J,et al. The Journal of Experimental Medicine . 1998
  • 7Blazar BR,Taylor PA,Panoskalasis-Mortari J,et al. J Immunol . 1997
  • 8Kirk AD,Burkly LC,Batty DS,et al. Nature Medicine . 1999
  • 9Kenyon NS,Chatzipetron M,Masetti M,et al. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America . 1999
  • 10Blazar BR,Taylor PA,Noelle RJ,et al. The Journal of Clinical Investigation . 1998

共引文献6

同被引文献26

  • 1曾慧兰,朱康儿,蒋建伟,谷怀民,严玉霞,蔡继业,程龙球,郑梅珍.Rhodamine123介导的光动力学疗法对小鼠淋巴细胞增殖及骨髓干祖细胞集落形成的影响[J].广东医学,2004,25(8):883-885. 被引量:1
  • 2殷胜勇,胡晨,李锦军,葛超,郑树森,顾健人.受体酪氨酸激酶c-kit及其配体SCF在正常肝及肝癌组织中的共表达[J].肿瘤,2006,26(6):502-506. 被引量:5
  • 3DEVINE S M,HOFFMAN R.Role of mesenchymal stem cells in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation[J].Curr Opin Hematol,2000,7 (6):358-359.
  • 4VOERMANSA C,ROOD P M,HORDIJK P L,et al.Adhesion molecules involved in transendothelial migration of human hematopoietic progenitor cells[J].Stem Cells,2000,18 (6):435-443.
  • 5KIM C H,BROXMEYER H E.In vitro behavior of hematopoietic progenitor cells under the influence of chemo attractants:stromal cell-derived fator-1,steel factor,and the bone marrow environment[J].Blood,1998,91 (1):100-110.
  • 6WATANABE T,DAVE B,HEIMANN D G,et al.Cell adhesion molecule expression on CD34 + cells in grafts and time to myeloid and platelet recovery after autologous stem cell transplantation[J].Exp Hematol,1998,26(1):10-18.
  • 7HESS D A,LEVAC K D,KARANU F N,et al.Function analysis of human hematopoietic repopulating cells mobilized with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor alone versus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in combination with stem cell factor[J].Blood,2002,100(3):869-878.
  • 8Chen B J, Cui X, Liu C, et al. Prevention of graft - versus host disease while preserving graft - versus - leukemia effect after selective depletion of host - reactive T cells by photodynamic cell purging process[J]. Blood, 2002, 99(9): 3083 -3088.
  • 9Guimond M, Balassy A, Barrette M, et al. P- glycoprotein targeting: a unique strategy to selectively elininate immunoreactive T cells[J]. Blood, 2002, 100(2): 375 - 382.
  • 10Villeneuve L. Ex vivo photodynamic purging in chronic myelogenous leukaemia and other neoplasias with rhodamine derivatives[J]. Biotechnol Appl Biochem, 1999, 30(1): 1 - 17.

引证文献6

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部