期刊文献+

语篇连贯的外部条件:语篇回指的心理表征分析 被引量:14

Mental Representation as a Means of Tracking Anaphora in Narrative Discourse
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 语篇连贯的条件可能是内部的,也可能是外部的。语篇指称理论不能只满足于描写指称词语在语篇内的具体所指,还要揭示读者在辨认和解释指称关系时所依赖的认知结构和心理过程。读者解读代词回指的过程是建立心理表征的心智过程,因此,指称关系的内涵应包含心理表征结构中的相关信息,心理表征作为语篇外部的衔接关系也是语篇连贯的条件。 The factors which constitute coherence in discourse could be either internal or external. The reference theory should not only describe what referring expressions actually refer to in discourse, but should also disclose the readers cognitive structure and psychological process s/he experiences in identifying and interpreting reference. The present study attempts to interpret anaphora in narrative discourse, and concludes that anaphoric referents need to be accounted for in a comprehensive model of reference and the referent, though constructed from the discourse, is located not in the discourse but in the readers mental representation. 
作者 俞洪亮
出处 《解放军外国语学院学报》 北大核心 2003年第4期13-17,共5页 Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages
关键词 语篇连贯 心理表征 指称关系 回指 coherence in discourse mental representation reference anaphora
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1俞洪亮.英语动词时态形式在自由间接引语中的衔接功能[J].外国语,1996,19(6):42-46. 被引量:4
  • 2张德禄.论衔接[J].外国语,2001,24(2):23-28. 被引量:197
  • 3张德禄.论语篇连贯[J].外语教学与研究,2000,32(2):103-109. 被引量:302
  • 4Ariel, M. Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents [M]. London: Routledge, 1990.
  • 5Ariel, M. Interpreting anaphoric expression: A cognitive versus a pragmatic approach [J]. Journal of Linguistics, 30 (1994): 3-42.
  • 6Bransford, J. D. & Franks, J. J. The abstractions of linguistic ideas [J]. Cognitive Psychology, 2 (1971): 221-350.
  • 7Brown, G. and Yule, G. Discourse Analysis[M]. Cambridge: CPU, 1983.
  • 8Chafe, W. Cognitive constraints on information flow[A]. In R. Tomlin (ed) Coherence and Grounding in Discourse [C]. Amsterdam:Benjamins, 1987. 21-51.
  • 9Emmott, C. Splitting the referent: an introduction to narrative enactors [A]. In Martin Davies and Louise Ravelli (eds.), Advances in Systemic Linguistics: Recent Theory and Practice [C]. London and New York: Pinter Publishers, 1992. 221-228.
  • 10Gernsbacher, M. A. Language Building as Structure Building [M]. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1990.

二级参考文献6

  • 1Danes, E Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text[A]. Danes, E Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective[C]. The Hague: Mouton, 1974. 106-128.
  • 2Fies, Peter. On the status of theme in English: argument from discourse[J]. Forum Linguisticum, 1981, 6(1): 1-38.
  • 3Brown, G. & Yule, G. Discourse Analysis [M]. Cambridge: CUP, 1983.
  • 4Van Dijk, T. A. Text and Context: Explorations in the Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse [M]. London: Longman, 1977.
  • 5Halliday, M. A. K. & Hasan, R. Cohesion in English [M]. London: Longman, 1976.
  • 6Halliday, M. A. K. & Hasan, R. Language,Context and Text [M]. Victoria: Deakin University Press, 1985.

共引文献461

同被引文献216

引证文献14

二级引证文献75

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部