摘要
轻罪与重罪在实体、程序和证据层面实然有别,两类案件治理所承载的刑罚功能预设亦全然不同。然而,作为刑法体系的两重组成部分,轻罪治理目标的实现应然有赖于重罪治理的优化转型。为助力轻罪治理目标的有效实现,刑事立法与刑事司法应当围绕我国当下重罪治理于实体、程序与证明三重维度的实践现状作出省察,并以此为基础遵循问题意识,演绎勾勒出轻罪治理视域下以刑事实体法、刑事程序法和刑事证据法相互联动为具体路径的重罪治理的转型图景。
Misdemeanors and felonies are different in terms of substantive,procedural and evidentiary aspects,and their governance also carries completely different presuppositions of penal functions.However,as two components of the criminal law system,the realization of the goal of misdemeanor governance should depend on the paradigm shift of felony governance.In order to maximize the effective realization of the goal of misdemeanor governance,criminal legislation and criminal justice should focus on the current paradigm status of the governance of felony in China in the three areas of entity,procedure and proof,and follow the problem awareness to outline the transformation of the governance of felony deductively.It requires the effective coordination between the criminal substantive law,the criminal procedural law,and the criminal evidence law.
出处
《地方立法研究》
2025年第4期107-124,共18页
Local Legislation Journal
基金
2025年度陕西省哲学社会科学研究专项一般项目“刑事审判阶段事实认定疑难处理方式研究”(2025YB0375)的阶段性成果。
关键词
重罪治理
轻罪治理
同案不同判
重罪认罪认罚
主观化证明
addressing felony problems
misdemeanor governance
different sentences for similar cases
felony guilty plea and punishment
subjective proof
作者简介
步洋洋,西北政法大学人权研究中心教授。
