摘要
目的分析单核细胞人白细胞DR抗原(mHLA-DR)、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)及CD4^(+)T淋巴细胞对脓毒症患者预后的预测价值.方法收集2023年12月至2024年9月入住青岛市市立医院重症医学科的29例脓毒症患作为研究对象,根据28 d预后将患者分为存活组(20例)与死亡组(9例).收集患者入院时的基线资料[包括患者的性别、年龄、急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ)评分、序贯器官衰竭评分(SOFA)、白细胞计数(WBC)、NLR、血红蛋白(Hb)、血小板计数(PLT)、C-反应蛋白(CRP)、总蛋白(TP)、丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)、天冬氨酸转氨酶(AST)、肌酐(Cr)、CD4^(+)T淋巴细胞计数]和入院1、3、7 d mHLA-DR水平,并计算入院3 d、7 d mHLA-DR表达率与入院1 d的差值,记为ΔH3、ΔH7.比较不同预后两组患者上述指标的差异.绘制受试者工作特征曲线(ROC曲线)评价mHLA-DR、NLR、CD4^(+)T淋巴细胞计数、SOFA评分及APACHEⅡ评分对脓毒症患者28 d死亡风险的预测价值.结果与存活组比较,死亡组APACHEⅡ评分、SOFA评分、NLR均明显升高,ΔH7、CD4^(+)T淋巴细胞计数均明显降低(均P<0.05).ROC曲线分析显示:ΔH7、NLR、CD4^(+)T淋巴细胞计数、SOFA评分及APACHEⅡ评分均对脓毒症患者28 d预后均有预测价值,ROC曲线下面积(AUC)和95%可信区间(95%CI)分别为0.817(0.635~0.999)、0.789(0.611~0.966)、0.786(0.588~0.985)、0.853(0.685~1.000)、0.844(0.659~1.000),均P<0.05.ΔH7联合NLR、ΔH7联合CD4^(+)T淋巴细胞、NLR联合CD4^(+)T淋巴细胞以及ΔH7、NLR、CD4^(+)T淋巴细胞3者联合检测对脓毒症患者28 d预后亦有预测价值,AUC和95%CI分别为0.867(0.735~0.998)、0.878(0.752~1.000)、0.883(0.760~1.000)、0.928(0.837~1.000),均P<0.05.结论脓毒症患者入院1 d NLR及CD4^(+)T淋巴细胞计数可预测脓毒症患者预后,动态监测脓毒症患者mHLA-DR水平同样可以预测脓毒症患者预后,然而7 d内单次测定mHLA-DR水平没有意义.就单指标而言,ΔH7在ΔH7、NLR、CD4^(+)T淋巴细胞计数3个指标中对于脓毒症患者预后的预测价值最佳,3个指标联合检测对脓毒症患者预后判断更具优势.
Predictive value of monocyte human leukocyte antigen-DR,neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio,and CD4^(+)T lymphocytes in sepsis prognosis Abstract:Objective To evaluate the prognostic value of monocyte human leukocyte antigen-DR(mHLA-DR),neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio(NLR),and CD4^(+)T lymphocytes in sepsis.Methods A total of 29 patients with sepsis who were admitted to the department of critical care medicine of Qingdao Municipal Hospital from December 2023 to September 2024 were collected as the study subjects,and the patients were divided into survival group(20 cases)and death group(9 cases)according to the 28-day prognosis.Baseline data were collected from patients at the time of admission[including gender,age,acute physiology and chronic health evaluationⅡ(APACHEⅡ)score,sequential organ failure assessment(SOFA),white blood cell count(WBC),NLR,hemoglobin(Hb),platelet count(PLT),C-reactive protein(CRP),total protein(TP),alanine aminotransferase(ALT),aspartate aminotransferase(AST),creatinine(Cr),CD4^(+)T lymphocyte count]and the mHLA-DR expression rate on the 1st,3rd,and 7th days of admission,and the difference between the mHLA-DR expression rate on the 3rd,7th and 1st days of admission and the 1st day of admission was calculated,which was recorded asΔH3 andΔH7.The receiver operator characteristic curve(ROC curve)was used to evaluate the predictive value of mHLA-DR expression,NLR,CD4^(+)T lymphocyte count,SOFA score and APACHEⅡscore on the 28-day mortality risk of sepsis.Results Compared with the survival group,the APACHEⅡscore,SOFA score and NLR in the death group were significantly increased,and theΔH7 and CD4^(+)T lymphocyte counts were significantly decreased(all P<0.05).ROC curve analysis showed thatΔH7,NLR,CD4^(+)T lymphocyte count,SOFA score and APACHEⅡscore were predictive of the 28-day prognosis of sepsis patients,and area under the curve(AUC)and 95%confidence interval(95%CI)were 0.817(0.635-0.999),0.789(0.611-0.966),0.786(0.588-0.985),and 0.853(0.685-1.000),0.844(0.659-1.000),all P<0.05.The combined detection ofΔH7 combined with NLR,ΔH7 combined with CD4^(+)T lymphocytes,NLR combined with CD4^(+)T lymphocytes,andΔH7,NLR,and CD4^(+)T lymphocytes also had predictive value for the 28-day prognosis of sepsis patients,with AUC and 95%CI of 0.867(0.735-0.998),0.878(0.752-1.000),0.883(0.760-1.000),and 0.928(0.837-1.000),respectively,all P<0.05.Conclusion The NLR and CD4^(+)T lymphocyte count on the first day of admission to the hospital could predict the prognosis of sepsis patients,and the dynamic monitoring of mHLA-DR expression level in sepsis patients could also predict the prognosis of sepsis patients,but a single measurement of mHLA-DR expression level within 7 days was meaningless.In terms of single indicators,ΔH7 had the best predictor of the prognosis of sepsis patients among the 3 indicators ofΔH7,NLR and CD4^(+)T lymphocyte count,and the combined detection of the 3 indicators was more advantageous in the prognosis of sepsis patients.
作者
杨奋明
李庆淑
尚昱君
曲彦
谢伟峰
Yang Fenming;Li Qingshu;Shang Yujun;Qu Yan;Xie Weifeng(Qingdao University Medical College,Qingdao 266071,Shandong,China;Department of Critical Care Medicine,Qingdao Municipal Hospital,Qingdao 266071,Shandong,China)
出处
《中国中西医结合急救杂志》
2025年第1期16-20,共5页
Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine in Intensive and Critical Care
基金
国家自然科学基金(81971873)。
作者简介
通信作者:谢伟峰,Email:xwf726@163.com。
