摘要
学界普遍认为传世文献与鄂君启节中的“庐(泸)江”即今青弋江。重新梳理传世文献,“青弋江说”存在严重缺陷,而今鄱江更为契合。新近考古调查揭示,今安徽省铜陵地区秦汉铜矿冶遗址群就是汉代吴国、丹阳郡铜山。吴国铜山地处青弋江以西,则青弋江流域不在淮南国庐江郡境,失去对应为庐江的可能。考古发现所见战国时期楚国疆域变迁进一步揭示,今皖南地区晚至战国末年纳入楚国疆域,与鄂君启节所见战国中期楚国以“泸江”为东界的形势不符,进一步排除庐江为今青弋江的可能。综合文献记载与先秦夏越交通形势,庐江应为今鄱江,屈原《招魂》之“庐江”也是此水。鄂君启节之“爰陵”或为秦汉鄱阳县。
It is commonly believed in academia that“Lujiang”in transmitted texts and the inscription on E Jun Qi Jie is present-day Qingyi River.However,the previous argument is found of much defect after restudying transmitted texts.“Lujiang”is more likely the river system on the east of present-day Poyang Lake.Firstly,the late archaeological research reveals that copper mines in Wu Kingdom and Danyang Commandery in Han Dynasty are located in Tongling,Anhui Province.As the copper mines of Wu Kingdom are to the west of Qingyi River,Qingyi River couldn’t be located in Lujiang Commandery of Huainan Kingdom.Secondly,archaeological study on territorial evolution of Chu Kingdom in Warring States Period further reveals that present-day southern Anhui was not a part of Chu Kingdom until late Warring States Period.Should“Lujiang”be present-day Qingyi River,it couldn’t be the border of Chu Kingdom in middle Warring States Period as is recorded in the inscription on E Jun Qi Jie.Consequently,“Lujiang”is not present-day Qingyi River.Taking texts and pre-Qin traffic system between Xia and Yue Region into consideration,this essay argues that“Lujiang”is Po River system.Besides,“Lujiang”in Qu Yuan’s Zhaohun(招魂)is the same river.“Yuanling”in inscription on E Jun Qi Jie may be Poyang County in Qin and Han Dynasty.
作者
马孟龙
MA Menglong(History Department,Fudan University,Shanghai 200433,China)
出处
《湖南大学学报(社会科学版)》
北大核心
2025年第3期89-96,共8页
Journal of Hunan University(Social Sciences)
基金
国家社会科学基金项目:出土简牍文献与秦汉县邑定位研究(22BZS013)。
关键词
庐江
鄂君启节
吴国铜山
庐江郡
爰陵
Lujiang
E Jun Qi Jie
Copper mines of Wu Kingdom
Lujiang Commandery
Yuanling
作者简介
马孟龙(1981-),男,辽宁沈阳人,复旦大学历史学系教授,博士生导师,博士,研究方向:历史地理、秦汉史。
