摘要
技术治理与道德治理是当前社会治理的两种重要模式,技术治理主张运用科学方法、技术手段来运行与治理社会,道德治理强调道德在社会运行与治理中的重要作用。由于在治理方法、治理逻辑、治理目标、治理特征等方面存在诸多不同,技术治理与道德治理在功能上能形成很好互补。一方面,可以通过对技术治理进行道德调适来应对技术治理在运行中存在的伦理风险,如通过对算法治理进行伦理审查以规避算法治理在运行中出现伦理风险。另一方面,可以运用科学方法、技术手段来提高道德治理的运行效率,道德物化、道德增强等思想是较具代表性的例子。
Technological governance and moral governance are two important models of current social governance.The former advocates the use of scientific methods and technological means to run and govern society,while the latter emphasizes the important role of morality in social operation and governance.As there are many differences in the methods,logic,objectives,characteristics and other aspects of governance,technological governance and moral governance can complement each other in functions.On the one hand,the ethical risks in the operation of technological governance can be dealt with through moral adjustment,such as conducting ethical reviews of algorithmic governance to avoid ethical risks in its operation.On the other hand,scientific methods and technological means can be used to improve the operational efficiency of moral governance,the ideas of moralizing technology and moral enhancement are more representative examples.
作者
兰立山
LAN Lishan(Department of Philosophy,Party School of the C.P.C Central Committee/National Academy of Governance,Beijing,100091)
出处
《自然辩证法通讯》
北大核心
2025年第2期36-43,共8页
Journal of Dialectics of Nature
基金
中央党校(国家行政学院)2022年度青年项目“比较政治哲学视域下的算法官僚制研究”(项目编号:2022QN030)。
关键词
技术治理
道德治理
功能互补
道德调适
技术铺助
Technological governance
Moral governance
Functional complementation
Moral adjustment
Technological assistance
作者简介
兰立山(1987-)男,贵州黄平人,中共中央党校(国家行政学院)哲学教研部副教授,研究方向为科学哲学、技术哲学、科学技术与社会。Email:lan_lishan@163.com。
