期刊文献+

卡维地洛联合缬沙坦氢氯噻嗪治疗顽固性高血压的临床研究 被引量:32

Clinical study on carvedilol combined with valsartan and hydrochlorothiazide in treatment of refractory hypertension
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨卡维地洛联合缬沙坦氢氯噻嗪治疗顽固性高血压的临床疗效。方法选择2017年4月—2018年4月在延安大学附属医院治疗的顽固性高血压患者86例,根据用药差别分为对照组(43例)和治疗组(43例)。对照组口服缬沙坦氢氯噻嗪片,1片/次,1次/d;治疗组在对照组基础上口服卡维地洛片,起始6.25 mg/次,2次/d,根据血压情况成倍增减剂量,最大剂量小于50 mg/d。两组患者均治疗4周。观察两组患者临床疗效,同时比较治疗前后两组患者血压、HAMA评分、HAMD评分、SPIEGEL评分、SF-36评分、肱动脉内皮依赖性舒张功能(EDD)、肱动脉非内皮依赖的舒张功能(NMD)及血清C反应蛋白(CRP)、同型半胱氨酸(Hcy)、内皮素-1(ET-1)、血管性血友病因子(v WF)和血管紧张素Ⅱ(AngⅡ)水平。结果治疗后,对照组临床有效率为79.07%,显著低于治疗组的95.35%,两组比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。经治疗,两组患者SBP、DBP均明显下降(P<0.05),且治疗组患者收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)明显低于对照组患者(P<0.05)。经治疗,两组HAMA、HAMD和SPIEGEL评分明显降低(P<0.05),SF-36评分明显升高(P<0.05),且治疗组患者HAMA、HAMD、SPIEGEL和SF-36评分明显优于对照组患者(P<0.05)。经治疗,两组患者EDD、NMD均明显升高(P<0.05),且治疗组患者EDD、NMD明显高于对照组患者(P<0.05)。经治疗,两组患者血清CRP、Hcy、ET-1、v WF、AngⅡ均明显降低(P<0.05),且治疗组患者上述血清细胞因子明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论卡维地洛片联合缬沙坦氢氯噻嗪片治疗顽固性高血压可有效降低患者血压水平,促进血管内皮功能改善,改善患者焦虑、抑郁情绪,促进患者睡眠及生活质量提高。 Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of carvedilol combined with valsartan hydrochlorothiazide in treatment of refractory hypertension.Methods Patients(86 cases)with refractory hypertension in Yan’an University Affiliated Hospital from April 2017 to April 2018 were divided into control(43 cases)and treatment(43 cases)groups based on different treatments.Patients in the control group were po administered with Valsartan and Hydrochlorothiazide Tablets,1 tablet/time,once daily.Patients in the treatment group were po administered with Carvedilol Tablets on the basis of the control group,the initial dose was 6.25 mg/time,twice daily.The dose was increased or decreased according to blood pressure,and the maximum dose was less than 50 mg/d.Patients in two groups were treated for 4 weeks.After treatment,the clinical efficacy was evaluated,and the blood pressure,HAMA scores,HAMD scores,SPIEGEL scores,SF-36 scores,EDD,NMD,and serum CRP,Hcy,ET-,vWF and AngⅡlevels in two groups before and after treatment were compared.Results After treatment,the clinical efficacy in the control group was 79.07%,which was significantly lower than 95.35%in the treatment group,and there were differences between two groups(P<0.05).After treatment,the SBP and DBP in two groups were significantly decreased(P<0.05),and SBP and DBP in the treatment group were significantly lower than those in the control group(P<0.05).After treatment,the HAMA,HAMD and SPIEGEL scores in two groups were significantly decreased(P<0.05),but SF-36 scores were significantly increased(P<0.05),and these scores in the treatment group were significantly better than those in the control group(P<0.05).After treatment,the EDD and NMD in two groups were significantly increased(P<0.05),and EDD and NMD in the treatment group were significantly higher than those in the control group(P<0.05).After treatment,the serum CRP,Hcy,ET-1,vWF and AngⅡlevels in two groups were significantly decreased(P<0.05),and these serological indexes in the treatment group were significantly lower than those in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion Carvedilol combined with valsartan and hydrochlorothiazide in treatment of refractory hypertension can effectively reduce the blood pressure level,promote the improvement of vascular endothelial function,improve anxiety and depression,promote sleep and quality of life of patients.
作者 郭浩 高波 李江 毕云 GUO Hao;GAO Bo;LI Jiang;BI Yun(Department of Cardiology,Yan'an University Affiliated Hospital,Yan'an 716000,China)
出处 《现代药物与临床》 CAS 2019年第9期2617-2621,共5页 Drugs & Clinic
关键词 卡维地洛片 缬沙坦氢氯噻嗪片 顽固性高血压 肱动脉内皮依赖性舒张功能 同型半胱氨酸 血管性血友病因子 Carvedilol Tablets Valsartan and Hydrochlorothiazide Tablets refractory hypertension EDD Hcy vWF
作者简介 郭浩,主治医师,主要从事高血压、冠心病、心衰临床研究。E-mail:fir07@126.com
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献69

  • 1周俊山,徐梦怡,陆敏.中青年急性脑梗死患者血浆同型半胱氨酸水平和超敏C反应蛋白与颈动脉粥样硬化的关系[J].脑与神经疾病杂志,2011,19(2):110-112. 被引量:20
  • 2Ware JE Jr, Snow KK, Kosinski M, et al.SF-36 health survey manual and interpretation guide.Boston: New England Medical Center the Health Institute,1993.1-12.
  • 3Perneger TV, Leplege A, Etter JF,et al.Validation of a French-language version of the MOS 36-Item Short Form Health Survey(SF-36) in young healthy adults.J Clin Epidemiol, 1995,48:1051-1060.
  • 4Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D.Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines.J Clin Epidemiol, 1993,46:1417-1432.
  • 5Gandek B, Ware JE Jr.Methods for validating and norming translations of health status questionnaires: the IQOLA Project approach.International Quality of Life Assessment.J Clin Epidemiol, 1998,51:953-959.
  • 6顾杏元,金丕焕.直线回归与相关.见: 金丕焕,主编.医用统计方法.上海:上海医科大学出版社,1993.115-119.
  • 7Lam CL, Gandek B, Ren XS, et al.Tests of scaling assumptions and construct validity of the Chinese(HK) version of the SF-36 Health Survey.J Clin Epidemiol, 1998,51:1139-1147.
  • 8Ren XS, Amick B 3rd, Zhou L, et al.Translation and psychometric evaluation of a Chinese version of the SF-36 Health Survey in the United States.J Clin Epidemiol, 1998,51:1129-1138.
  • 9Till JE, Osoba D, Pater JL, et al.Research on health-related quality of life: dissemination into practical applications.Qual Life Res, 1994,3:279-283.
  • 10Mathias SD, Fifer SK, Patrick DL.Rapid translation of quality of life measures for international clinical trials: avoiding errors in the minimalist approach.Qual Life Res, 1994,3:403-412.

共引文献2777

同被引文献275

引证文献32

二级引证文献80

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部