摘要
“文献”的本义中包含文字和口头两大传统,甚至田野调查也为古典人文建设所提倡。但相对于以经史为高标的典籍强势,口头传统向来居于辅助地位,且随着历史的发展越来越下沉到不太重要的文类等级中。这为民间文学的历史研究带来许多困难,需要因势利导地采取更有针对性的策略,比如以类型学穿越文献等级,充分意识到文人辨析民间文学的正反效用等。如何建立符合民间文学特质的专业文献学,有待深入探讨。
The original meaning of literature included both written and oral traditions,and even fieldwork was advocated by the classical construction of the humanities.However,in the Chinese canon tradition,where Confucian classics and historical texts are regarded as the highest standards,the oral tradition has always been secondary.Over time,it has increasingly been relegated to less significant categories of literary genres.This has posed numerous challenges for the historical study of folk literature.To address these challenges,researchers need to adopt more targeted strategies,such as employing typological approaches to transcend the hierarchy of literature,being fully aware of both the positive and negative impacts of literati's analyses of folk literature,and so on.More in-depth discussions are needed on how to establish a specialized philology that aligns with the characteristics of folk literature.
出处
《西北民族研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2024年第5期83-96,共14页
Journal of Northwestern Ethnic Studies
基金
国家社会科学基金重大项目“太湖流域民间信仰类文艺资源的调查与跨学科研究”(编号:17ZDA167)的阶段性成果。
关键词
文献观
口头传统
民间文学
文献等级
The View of Literature
Oral Tradition
Folk Literature
The Hierarchy of Literature
作者简介
陈泳超,北京大学中文系教授、博士生导师。北京100871。
