比较教育研究差异性逻辑的实践向度与价值尺度被引量：2

The Practical Orientations and Value Yardsticks of Differential Logic in Comparative Education Research

在线阅读下载PDF

导出

摘要在西方中心的普遍主义价值导向影响下,非西方国家比较教育研究长期以来过度追求教育的同一性而忽视了差异性,造成了研究视域的窄化、方法论民族主义的僵化和服务教育改革能力的弱化,自身也陷入学术依附的发展困境。对此,将坚持教育的差异性作为本体论前提,关注教育关系的复杂性作为方法论基础,尊重教育发展的主体性作为实践论要求,实现教育利益的共享性作为价值论旨趣的差异性逻辑,为比较教育研究提供了一种可能的新思路。比较教育学者需要坚持“在世界之中平等对话”的实践向度,通过转换研究视域,更新研究方法,增强学术自主,提升服务能力,才能将差异性逻辑转化为具体的方法论原则,并在尊重教育差异中推动实现全球教育共同发展。比较教育研究提倡差异性逻辑,并不是要将其绝对化,还需遵循求真、向善和爱美的价值尺度,朝向教育本身探索教育规律,推动全球教育善治实现共同福祉,加强教育生态正义共建清洁美丽世界。 Under the influence of the universalist value orientation centered in the west,comparative education research in non western countries has long excessively pursued the identity of education while neglecting differences,resulting in a narrow research perspective,a rigid methodology of nationalism,and a weakened ability to serve education reform.It has also fallen into the development dilemma of academic dependence.In this regard,the differential logic of adhering to the differences in education as the ontological premise,paying attention to the complexity of educational relationships as the methodological foundation,respecting the subjectivity of educational development as the practical requirement,and realizing the sharing of educational interests as the value theory's purpose provides a possible new approach for comparative education research.Comparative education scholars need to adhere to the practical dimension of"equal dialogue in the world",by transforming research perspectives,updating research methods,enhancing academic autonomy,and enhancing service capabilities,in order to transform the logic of differences into specific methodological principles and promote the common development of global education while respecting educational differences.Comparative education research advocates for differential logic,not to absolutize it,but also to follow the values of seeking truth,kindness,and love for beauty,explore the laws of education itself,promote good governance in global education to achieve common well-being,strengthen educational ecological justice,and jointly build a clean and beautiful world.

作者王超孔令帅 WANG Chao;KONG Lingshuai(Research Institute for International and Comparative Education,Shanghai Normal University,Shanghai 200234,China)

机构地区上海师范大学国际与比较教育研究院

出处《外国教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2024年第4期14-30,共17页 Studies in Foreign Education

关键词比较教育同一性逻辑差异性逻辑实践向度价值尺度 comparative education identity logic differential logic practical orientations value yardsticks

分类号 G40-059.3 [文化科学—教育学原理]

作者简介王超,上海师范大学国际与比较教育研究院博士生;通讯作者:孔令帅,上海师范大学国际与比较教育研究院教授、博士生导师,教育学博士。