摘要
创新链与产业链融合发展能优化双链协同性和开放性,增强比较优势和创新链韧性,使得创新更容易发生,产业链分工更加紧密。双链融合内在驱动力主要得益于创新基础能力的强化、产业内创新与产业间创新的广泛开展。从创新基础能力、产业内创新网络、产业间创新网络3个维度设计评价指标体系,利用产业数据和技术专利数据对中国及部分OECD国家的产业链与创新链融合情况进行对比分析。研究发现:总体而言,我国创新链产业链融合指数水平近30年来实现大幅提升,目前与日本相当,高于韩国及OECD平均水平,但落后于美国和德国,在一些关键核心技术领域与全球领先水平相比仍有差距,双链融合发展存在不容忽视的风险。为此,需聚焦关键核心技术创新重点领域,不断完善高端要素体系,夯实双链融合基础能力,促进产业间融合创新和地区间互补创新。
The integrated development of the industrial chain and the innovation chain is of great significance for China to achieve high-level scientific and technological self-reliance.For a long time,research on the integrated development of the innovation chain and industrial chain has generally stayed at the macro level,the industry level,or a specific link of the industrial chain innovation chain,and thus the specific level of their integration,especially the integration within and between industries is obscure.On the basis of the patent data in PATSTAT database and China's classification of strategic emerging industries,this study builds a more scientific and reasonable double-strand fusion index system from three perspectives:innovation basic ability,intra-industry innovation network and inter-industry innovation network,and explores how innovation chain and industrial chain are integrated and the specific level of integration development from the micro level to find out the deep-seated mechanism and law of double-strand fusion development more clearly.In this paper,the reference table of strategic emerging industry classification and international patent classification(2021)(Trial)issued by the China National Intellectual Property Administration is used to construct the industrial patent matching data,and the industrial classification code is related to the patent through the patent IPC mapping relationship in PATSTAT,and it is used as the basic data for subsequent research.A detailed comparison between China and some OECD countries'industrial chains and innovation chains'integration is made by first analyzing the innovation basic capability index,intra-industry innovation network index and inter-industry innovation network index,and then the development index of double-chain integration of various economies.It is found that,in terms of innovation basic capability index,China has caught up with the OECD average level and is slightly higher than the United States,Japan and South Korea,but significantly lower than Germany;in terms of intra-industry innovation network index,China has achieved a great leap,but it is still lower than the United States and Germany;in terms of inter-industry innovation network index,China has risen rapidly,surpassing the average level of OECD,and now it is only behind the United States(but with a big gap)and slightly higher than Japan;in terms of integration index,it is very close to Germany at present,slightly higher than the average level of Japan,South Korea and OECD,but the gap with the United States is obvious.On the whole,the level of China's double-stranded integrated index has been greatly improved in the past 30 years.At present,it is comparable to Japan,higher than the average level of South Korea and the OECD,but still lags behind the United States and Germany.There are still some gaps compared with the global leading levels in some fields,and deficiencies in the construction of intra-industry technology networks and inter-industry technology interaction.The development of double-stranded integration faces risks including intermediate sources,middle income traps,export channels,internal circulation systems and value chain dominance.In order to accelerate inter-industry and intra-industry integration and innovation and jointly promote the integration and development of the industrial chain in the innovation chain,it is first of all essential to focus on key technologies in core fields,enhance the control of the commanding heights of the double chain,strengthen the research of cutting-edge technology,promote future industrial development,and build an efficient industry-university-research cooperation platform to give full play to the functions of resource integration and achievement transformation.Second,efforts should be made to promote inter-industry integration and innovation,guide the industrial chain to drive the development of the innovation chain,strengthen cross-industry technology integration and innovation,further promote the development of"manufacturing+service"integration,and the organic integration of new elements and traditional elements.Third,it is necessary to promote complementary innovation among regions and the supporting role of the innovation chain in the industrial chain,handle the relationship between regional layout and regional coordination,inter-industry and intra-industry,formulate innovation policies focusing on technology clusters for different regions,and form a multi-dimensional,three-dimensional and complementary technological innovation pattern between regions,industries and intra-industries.
作者
陈英武
郑江淮
王嘉杰
冉征
张睿
Chen Yingwu;Zheng Jianghuai;Wang Jiajie;Ran Zheng;Zhang Rui(Jiangsu Institute of Economic and Information Technology,Nanjing 210003,China;School of Economics,Nanjing University;School of Information Management,Nanjing University,Nanjing 210008,China;School of Economic and Management,Southeast University,Nanjing 211189,China)
出处
《科技进步与对策》
CSSCI
北大核心
2024年第6期75-85,共11页
Science & Technology Progress and Policy
基金
国家社会科学基金重大项目(22&ZD093)。
关键词
技术专利
创新链
产业链
融合发展
Technology Patent
Innovation Chain
Industrial Chain
Integrated Development
作者简介
陈英武(1972-),男,江苏扬州人,博士,江苏省经济和信息化研究院副院长,研究方向为产业经济与区域经济;郑江淮(1968-),男,江苏淮安人,南京大学经济学院院长、教授、博士生导师,研究方向为产业经济和区域经济;王嘉杰(2000-),男,浙江宁波人,南京大学信息管理学院博士研究生,研究方向为科技创新和信息管理;冉征(1994-),男,江苏淮安人,博士,东南大学经济管理学院博士后,研究方向为产业经济与区域经济;张睿(1984-),男,江苏南京人,南京大学经济学院博士研究生,研究方向为产业经济与区域经济。
