摘要
行政处罚集体讨论决定制度是宪法规定的行政首长负责制在行政处罚领域的具体适用,旨在监督制约公权力的运行。根据《行政处罚法》第57条第2款的规定,《档案行政处罚程序规定》第34条第2款规定了档案行政处罚集体讨论决定制度。但囿于《行政处罚法》《档案法》的原则性规定以及行政法规《档案法实施办法》未及时修订,该制度适用存在着法律属性不明晰、适用情形不清晰、负责人范围不具体、讨论程序时点不统一、会议记录不规范等现实困境。文章认为应当从明晰法律属性、细化适用情形、框定负责人范围、规范集体讨论会议记录等五个方面进行规范,以充分发挥集体讨论决定制度功能。
The collective discussion and decision system of administrative penalties is a specific application of the administrative head responsibility system,as stipulated in the Constitution,within the realm of administrative penalties.Its purpose is to supervise and restrict the operation of public power.As per Article 57(2)of the Administrative Penalty Law,and Article 34(2)of the Regulations on the Procedure for Administrative Penalties in Archives,this system is applied to administrative penalties in archives.However,due to the principle provisions of the Administrative Penalty Law and the Archives Law,along with a lack of timely revision of the Administrative Regulations on the Implementation of the Archives Law,the system has consistently faced practical challenges such as unclear legal attributes,ambiguous application scenarios,undefined scope of responsible individuals,inconsistent discussion procedures,and non-standard meeting records.This study suggests that regulations should be implemented from five aspects:clarifying legal attributes,refining applicable situations,defining the scope of responsible individuals,and standardizing meetings records of collective discussions,and thereby fully utilizing the functions of the collective discussion and decision system.
作者
林华东
杨春志
Lin Huadong;Yang Chunzhi(Law School of Huaiyin Normal University,Huai'an,Jiangsu 223001;China Urban Science Research Association,Beijing 100835)
出处
《档案与建设》
北大核心
2023年第10期27-31,共5页
Archives & Construction
基金
江苏省社科基金一般项目“行政处罚权下放镇街制度的江苏实践与优化策略研究”(项目编号:23FXB002)阶段性研究成果。
关键词
行政处罚
集体讨论决定制度
程序正当
Administrative Penalties
Collective Discussion and Decision System
Due Process
