摘要
国家文化公园建设意义重大,吸引了学界的众多关注,迄今形成了公园个案、国家公园、文化遗产、运营管理、空间功能、项目技术、符号传播等研究路径。现有研究路径呈现实践问题导向,试图解决国家文化公园涉及的地方文化内涵挖掘梳理不够、复杂性认识定位不清、地方统筹协调力度不强、转化机制探索不足等问题。在理论上需进一步探索解释不同文化区的横向整合、不同尺度的纵向整合和不同价值的判断选择的机理问题。文章尝试提出在整合现有研究路径基础上的“321”研究框架,即在国家文化公园的文化、空间、管理三大要素基础上,探索横向与纵向两对关系,强化价值研究的系统框架。
The report of the 20"National Congress of the Communist Party of China proposed the effective building and use of national cultural parks,further indicating the direction for constructing such parks.The building of national cultural parks is a highly significant endeavor and has attracted considerable academic attention.Thus far,research paths have been formed on park cases,national parks,cultural heritage,operation and management,spatial functions,project technologies,and symbolic communication.Among these paths,the park cases path generally selects a certain park or discusses the overall development of these parks regarding the building experience and the practical use of certain types of national cultural parks.The national parks path compares domestic and foreign national park-related laws and regulations,policies and systems,and representative practices and cases of national park planning,construction,management and operation.The cultural heritage path examines the construction of national cultural parks from a linear or regional cultural heritage perspective.The operation and management path focuses on the"meta-questions"of cultural heritage management practices,such as"who should manage?"and"how should they be managed?"The spatial function path focuses on the spatial production mechanism of national cultural parks.The project technologies path explores the role of major projects and technologies in supporting national cultural parks.The symbolic communication path explores how national cultural parks can be disseminated as a symbolic carrier of the Chinese cultural community.The existing research paths generally are problem-oriented and can be conceptualized as a"national cultural park+"perspective;In other words,exploring a series of issues,such as planning,design,construction,management,and operation of these parks.Besides,is a"+national cultural park"perspective,which is a generalization and sublimation based on the Great Wall,Grand Canal,Long March,Yellow River and Yangtze River National Cultural Parks.These studies all try to solve the problems concerning the national cultural parks,such as inadequate exploration and arranging of local cultural connotations,unclear understanding and positioning of complexity,weak local coordination,and insufficient exploration of transformation mechanisms.Theoretically,further exploration is needed to explain the mechanism issues of horizontal integration of different cultural zones,vertical integration of different scales,and judgmental choices of different values.This study seeks to propose a"321"research framework based on integrating existing research paths;In other words,a systematic framework that explores the relationship between horizontal and vertical pairs and strengthens value research based on the three major elements of national cultural parksculture,space,and management.The significance of this study is in its organizing and analyzing the research paths for national cultural parks to enable researchers to think and position these parks more clearly in a relatively clear problem domain,theoretical domain,and discourse domain;to identify the research dialogues between national cultural parks and existing cultural heritage,cultural management,cultural communication,cultural space,cultural technology,and other such topics;and to strengthen the relationship between national cultural parks and the Great Wall,Grand Canal,Long March,Yellow River,Yangtze River and other research subjects.
作者
戴俊骋
DAI Juncheng(School of Cultural and Communication,Central University of Finance and Econamics,Beijing 102206,China;Cultural Economics Research Institute,Central University of Finance and Economics,Beijing 100081,China)
出处
《旅游学刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2023年第6期40-51,共12页
Tourism Tribune
基金
国家自然科学基金“建设大运河国家文化公园的地方尺度转换和空间协调机制研究”(42071194)
中央财经大学“青年英才”培育支持计划(QYP202111)共同资助。
关键词
国家文化公园
路径分析
地方
尺度
national cultural park
path analysis
place
scale
作者简介
戴俊骋(1984-),男,福建罗源人,博士,教授,研究方向为文化经济与文化地理,E-mail:na0228@sina.com。
