摘要
生殖系基因编辑是一种优生技术。生殖系基因编辑科研自由的难题是生命伦理边界模糊的必然结果。生殖系基因编辑延续了优生学的传统,但优生学本身并不是反对生殖系基因编辑的理由。演化论同样不能构成禁止或放任优生技术的理由,演化论只是一种解释的模式。优生技术的风险在于,营造了一个极其模糊且逼促的科研领域。技术的逼促与教义性的禁止形成了微弱的平衡。生命伦理、优生学、演化论及优生技术本身,都不能单独作为优生技术划界的依据,为优生技术划界,只能依据法律本身。
Germline gene editing is an eugenic technology.The problem of freedom of scientific research in germline gene editing is the inevitable result of blurring the boundaries of bioethics.Germline gene editing continues the tradition of eugenics,but eugenics itself is not a reason to oppose germline gene editing.The theory of evolution does not constitute a reason for prohibiting or supporting eugenics technology,either,since the theory of evolution is a mere mode of explanation.The risk of eugenics technology lies in the creation of an extremely vague and compelling field of scientific research.The urging of technology and the doctrinal prohibition formed a weak balance.Bioethics,eugenics,evolution theory,and eugenic technology itself cannot be used as the basis for demarcation of eugenic technology alone.The delimitation of eugenic technology can only be based on the law.
作者
孔杨
KONG Yang(School of Law,Peking University,Beijing 100871,China)
出处
《太原理工大学学报（社会科学版）》
2022年第2期46-54,共9页
Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology(Social Science Edition)
关键词
基因编辑
科研自由
优生学
演化论
人的尊严
gene editing
freedom of research
eugenics
evolution theory
human dignity
作者简介
孔杨(1990-),女,北京人,北京大学博士生,主要从事法哲学、科技法研究。
