期刊文献+

妊娠期急性腹痛病人子宫破裂危险因素的Meta分析 被引量:1

Risk factors of uterine rupture among patients with acute abdominal pain during pregnancy:a Meta-analysis
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:通过Meta分析明确妊娠期急性腹痛病人发生子宫破裂的危险因素。方法:计算机检索PubMed、Web of Science、the Cochrane Library、EMbase、MedLine、中国生物医学文献数据库、中国知网、维普数据库、万方数据库中关于妊娠期子宫破裂危险因素的研究,检索时间为各数据库建库至2019年5月,由2名研究者独立检索、筛选文献,提取数据并进行质量评价,采用Stata 16.0软件进行Meta分析。结果:共纳入10篇文献,涉及1484444例病人,共18项危险因素。Meta分析结果显示,产妇年龄、多产是妊娠期子宫破裂的重要危险因素。结论:现有证据表明高龄、多产妊娠期急性腹痛孕妇发生子宫破裂的可能性较大。 Objective:To identify the risk factors of uterine rupture in patients with acute abdominal pain during pregnancy by Meta-analysis.Method:Studies on risk factors of uterine rupture during pregnancy were searched from PubMed,Web of Science,the Cochrane Library,EMbase,MedLine,CMB,CNKI,VIP,and WanFang database.The retrieval time was from the establishment of each database to May 2019.Two researchers independently searched and screened literatures,extracted data and evaluated the quality.Stata 16.0 was used for Meta-analysis.Results:A total of 10 articles were included,involving 1484444 patients and 18 risk factors.Meta-analysis results showed that maternal age and prolificacy were important risk factors for uterine rupture during pregnancy.Conclusion:Current evidence shows that elderly and prolific patients with acute abdominal pain during pregnancy are more likely to suffer from uterine rupture.
作者 江敏 张春瑾 瞿茜 李咪琪 张娜 严丽 黄素芳 JIANG Min;ZHANG Chunjin;QU Xi;LI Miqi;ZHANG Na;YAN Li;HUANG Sufang(Tongji Hospital,Tongji Medical College,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Hubei 430030 China)
出处 《循证护理》 2021年第6期740-745,共6页 Chinese Evidence-Based Nursing
关键词 子宫破裂 妊娠 腹痛 危险因素 META分析 循证护理 uterine rupture pregnancy abdominal pain risk factors Meta-analysis evidence-based nursing
作者简介 江敏,副主任护师,本科,E-mail:1710863116@qq.com。
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献100

  • 1黄少丽,姚映淑,郑宋英,丁莹,洪莹,崔建华(编校).高龄孕妇妊娠结局与妊娠并发症临床分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2007,22(7):875-876. 被引量:37
  • 2Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Birth AfterPrevious Caesarean Birth. Green-top Guideline No.45[EB/OL]. (2015-10-01) [2016-05-10]. https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg45/.
  • 3National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.Caesarean section. NICE clinical guideline 132[M].Manchester: NICE, 2011.
  • 4Sentilhes L, Vayssi^re C, Beucher G, et al. Delivery forwomen with a previous cesarean: guidelines for clinicalpractice from the French College of Gynecologists andObstetricians (CNGOF)[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Heprod Biol,2013,170(1):25-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.05.015.
  • 5Guise JM, Hashima J, Osterweil P. Evidence-based vaginalbirth after Caesarean section[J]. Best Pract Res Clin ObstetGynaecol, 2005,19(1):117-130. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015.
  • 6American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOGPractice bulletin no. 115: Vaginal birth after previouscesarean delivery[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2010, 116(2 Pt 1):450-456. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181eeb251.
  • 7Clark SM, Carver AH, Hankins GD. Vaginal birth aftercesarean and trial of labor after cesarean: what should we berecommending relative to maternal risk:benefit?[J]. WomensHealth (Lond), 2012,8(4):371-383. DOI: 10.2217/whe.l2.28.
  • 8Whitelaw N, Bhattacharya S, McLernon D, et al. Internetinformation on birth options after caesarean compared to theRCOG patient information leaflet; a web survey [J]. BMCPregnancy Childbirth, 2014,14:361. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-361.
  • 9Bujold E, Gauthier RJ. Risk of uterine rupture associated withan interdelivery interval between 18 and 24 months[J]. ObstetGynecol,2010,115(5):1003-1006. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.ObOBe-3181d992fb.
  • 10Dekker GA, Chan A,Luke CG, et al. Risk of uterine rupturein Australian women attempting vaginal birth after one priorcaesarean section: a retrospective population-based cohortstudy[J]. BJOG, 2010,117(11):1358-1365. DOI: 10.1111/j.l471-0528.2010.02688.x.

共引文献529

同被引文献15

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部