期刊文献+

血浆miRNA-155和miRNA-625测定诊断非小细胞肺癌的临床评价 被引量:2

Clinical evaluation of plasma mirRNA-155 and mirRNA-625 measurements in the diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)诊断中血浆miRNA-155、miRNA-625测定的临床价值。方法采用回顾性分析,研究对象为2018年1月至2020年1月首都医科大学附属北京世纪坛医院收治的98例NSCLC患者与110例肺部良性疾病患者,分别设定为研究组与对照组。比较2组血浆miRNA-155、miRNA-625表达水平与血清癌胚抗原水平,分析研究组患者血浆miRNA-155、miRNA-625表达与临床病理特征(性别、年龄、TNM分期、分化程度、组织学类型、吸烟)相关性,并比较miRNA-155、miRNA-625、血清癌胚抗原诊断NSCLC的准确性、阴性预测值、阳性预测值、特异度及敏感度。结果研究组血浆miRNA-155、血清癌胚抗原水平为(5.76±3.81)、(6.62±5.41)μg/L,高于对照组[(1.98±1.71)、(3.94±1.53)μg/L],血浆miRNA-625(0.53±0.43)水平低于对照组(1.08±0.61),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组Ⅰ、Ⅱ期患者的血浆miRNA-155表达水平(4.87±3.46)显著低于Ⅲ、Ⅳ期患者(8.52±3.70)(P<0.05);研究组男性患者的血浆miRNA-625表达水平(0.58±0.48)显著高于女性患者(0.34±0.20),且Ⅰ、Ⅱ期患者的血浆miRNA-625表达水平(0.83±0.40)显著高于Ⅲ、Ⅳ期患者(0.45±0.47),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。血浆miRNA-155、miRNA-625诊断NSCLC的敏感度(75.51%、73.47%)显著高于血清癌胚抗原(46.94%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论NSCLC诊断中血浆miRNA-155、miRNA-625测定具有较高的临床价值。 Objective To study the clinical value of plasma miRNA-155 and miRNA-625 in the diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC).Methods Using retrospective analysis methods,the study objects were 98 patients with NSCLC and 110 patients with benign lung diseases admitted to Beijing Shijitan Hospital,Capital Medical University from January 2018 to January 2020.They were set as the study group and the control group,respectively.The expression levels of miRNA-155,miRNA-625 and serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels were compared between the two groups,and the plasma miRNA-155,miRNA-625 expression and clinicopathological characteristics of the study group were analyzed(Gender,age,TNM stage,degree of differentiation,histological type,smoking)correlation,and compare the accuracy,negative predictive value,positive predictive value,specificity of miRNA-155,miRNA-625,serum carcinoembryonic antigen in the diagnosis of NSCLC And sensitivity.Results The levels of plasma miRNA-155 and serum carcinoembryonic antigen in the study group were 5.76±3.81,(6.62±5.41)μg/L,which were higher than the control group[1.98±1.71,(3.94±1.53)μg/L],plasma miRNA-625(0.53±0.43)was lower than the control group(1.08±0.61),and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The teamⅠ,Ⅱperiod in patients with plasma miRNA-155(4.87±3.46)expression level was significantly lower thanⅢ,Ⅳperiod patients(8.52±3.70)(P<0.05).The plasma miRNA-625 expression level of male patients(0.58±0.48)in the study group was significantly higher than that of female patients(0.34±0.20),and the plasma miRNA-625 expression level of patients with stage I and II(0.83±0.40)was significantly higher than that ofⅢ,For stage IV(0.45±0.47),the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The sensitivity of plasma miRNA-155 and miRNA-625(75.51%,73.47%)in diagnosis of NSCLC was significantly higher than that of serum oncoembryonic antigen(46.94%),the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion The measurement of plasma miRNA-155 and miRNA-625 in the diagnosis of NSCLC has high clinical value.
作者 安志杰 方天露 张捷 潘磊 AN Zhi-jie;FANG Tian-lu;ZHANG Jie(Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine,Beijing Shijitan Hospital,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100038,China)
出处 《临床和实验医学杂志》 2021年第7期718-721,共4页 Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine
基金 北京医卫健康公益基金会医学科学研究基金资助项目(编号:2017-A31)。
关键词 非小细胞肺癌 miRNA-155 miRNA-625 诊断价值 Non-small cell lung cancer MiRNA-155 MiRNA-625 Diagnostic value
作者简介 通讯作者:安志杰,E-mail:anzhijie2955@bjsjth.cn。
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献84

  • 1吴传勇,薛剑,娄加陶.microRNA在肺癌诊断、治疗及预后判断中的作用[J].上海交通大学学报(医学版),2011,31(3):368-372. 被引量:7
  • 2杨学宁,吴一龙.实体瘤治疗疗效评价标准——RECIST[J].循证医学,2004,4(2):85-90. 被引量:1734
  • 3AI Zobair A A, AI Obeidy B F, Yang L, et al. Concomitant overexpression of EGFR and CXCR4 is associated with worse prognosis in a new molecular subtype of non - small cell lung cancer[J]. Oneology reports, 2013, 29(4): 1524.
  • 4Acunzx M, Romano G, Palmieri D, et al. Cross - talk be- tween MET and EGFR in non - small cell lung cancer in- volves miR - 27a and Sprouty2 [ J ]. Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences, 2013, 110(21) : 8573.
  • 5Aydiner A, Yildiz I, Seyidova A. Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors Asmciated with the Response to Erlotinib in Non - Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Unknown EGFR Mutational Status[J]. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 2013, 14(5): 3255.
  • 6Araki T, Yashima H, Shimizu K, et al. Review of the treat- ment of non- small cell lung cancer with gefitinib[J ]. Clin Med Insights Oncol, 2012, 6: 407.
  • 7A1 Dayel F. EGFR mutation testing in non - small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)[J]. Journal of infection and public health, 2012, 5: S31.
  • 8Chen G, Kronenberger P, Teugels E, et al. Effect of siR- NAs targeting the EGFR T790M mutation in a non - small cell lung cancer cell line resistant to EGFR tyrosine kinase in- hibitors and combination with various agents[J]. Biochemical and biophysical research communications, 2013, 431 ( 3 ) : 623.
  • 9Lee E, Keam B, Kim D W, et al. Erlotinib versus gefitinib for control of leptomeningea eareinomatosis in non-small- cell lung cancer[J]. Journal of Thoracic Oncology, 2013, 8 (8) : 1069.
  • 10Jeon W I, Ryu P D, Lee S Y. Effects of voltage - gated K + channel blockers in gefitinib - resistant H460 non - small cell lung cancer cells [J]. Anticancer research, 2012, 32 (12) : 5279.

共引文献125

同被引文献15

引证文献2

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部