摘要
“居住”义动词演化为体标记是常见的语法化路径,广西白话与桂南平话的“居住”义动词都是“住”,又都演化为了体标记,却是两种不同的演化路径。桂南平话的“居住”义动词在演变出处所/存在动词之后,又受到原存处所动词“在”的影响进一步虚化;而广西白话的“居住”义动词没有“‘居住’义动词>处所/存在动词”这一演化路径,无法向处所介词的方向演化,而是遵循汉语史“居住”义动词演化的模式。广西白话与桂南平话没有因语言接触而在“居住”义动词上产生相互影响,这使得“居住”义动词衍生出了不同的演化路径。
It is a common grammaticalization path that the verb meaning“Dwell/Live”evolves into an aspect marker.In either Guangxi Baihua dialect or Guangxi Pinghua dialect,the verb meaning“Dwell/Live”is“zhu”(住),which also evolved into an aspect marker but in different ways in the two dialects.In Pinghua dialect in the south of Guangxi,under the influence of the existential verb“zai”(在),“zhu”(住)has been further grammaticalized as a case marker and aspect marker after changing its meaning to“Exist”.In contrast,“zhu”(住)in Guangxi Baihua dialect did not undergo the evolution path of“‘Dwell/Live’verb>locative verb/existence verb”,and couldn’t evolve in the direction of locative preposition.Instead,it followed the evolution pattern of“Dwell/Live”verb in Chinese history.In spite of language contact,there was no mutual influence between Guangxi Baihua and southern Pinghua on the verb of“Dwell/Live”,which made the verb of“Dwell/Live”develop in different evolutionary paths.
作者
田春来
陆彭琪
TIAN Chunlai;LU Pengqi(Center for Literary and Cultural Studies,Guangxi University,Nanning,China 530004;School of Liberal Arts,Guangxi University,Nanning,China 530004)
出处
《温州大学学报(社会科学版)》
2021年第2期1-10,共10页
Journal of Wenzhou University:Social Science Edition
基金
国家社会科学基金重大项目(14ZDB098)
国家社会科学基金西部项目(16XYY003)。
关键词
“居住”义动词
广西粤语
语法化
Verb Meaning“Dwell/Live”
Cantonese in Guangxi
Grammaticalization
作者简介
田春来(1978-),男,土家族,湖北巴东人,教授,博士,研究方向:汉语史。
