期刊文献+

开腹手术中超声引导下不可逆电穿孔联合化疗治疗局部进展期胰腺癌64例临床报告 被引量:8

Combining intraoperative ultrasound-guided irreversible electroporation with chemotherapy for treating locally advanced pancreatic cancer:a clinical report of 64 cases
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨开腹手术中超声引导下不可逆电穿孔(IRE)联合化疗治疗局部进展期胰腺癌(LAPC)的安全性和效果。方法回顾性收集2015年8月至2019年3月在中山大学附属肿瘤医院接受IRE联合化疗的64例LAPC患者的临床资料,男性30例,女性34例,中位年龄58.5岁(范围:34~87岁)。肿瘤位于胰头30例、胰体尾34例。肿瘤平均最大径6.1 cm(≤4.0 cm 35例、>4.0 cm 29例)。开腹手术中超声引导下进行IRE消融,根据肿瘤大小选择2~6根消融电极针,针距2 cm且相互平行,在横结肠系膜下方由足侧向头侧进针,使消融范围完全覆盖肿瘤。按治疗顺序将前15例和后49例分别定义为初期治疗组和中后期治疗组。符合正态分布的计量资料的比较采用t检验;计数资料的比较采用χ2检验。Kaplan-Meier法计算患者的总体生存(OS)和肿瘤无进展生存(PFS),Log-rank检验比较各临床病理学指标对生存率的影响。结果全组住院时间为(8.9±2.7)d(范围:5~20 d)。并发症发生率为20.3%(13/64),其中B级胰瘘、切口感染、上消化道大出血分别有7、4、2例。初期治疗组并发症发生率为10/15,2例死亡;中后期治疗组并发症发生率6.1%(3/49),无死亡病例。两组并发症发生率的差异有统计学意义(χ^2=26.01,P<0.01)。术后1个月腹痛减轻者占95.3%(61/64)(t=-28.55,P<0.01)。60例患者获得随访,随访率为93.8%,中位随访时间为29.3个月(范围:13.5~55.7个月)。全组OS时间为24.6个月(95%CI:22.0~27.3个月),PFS时间为12.0个月(95%CI:8.8~15.2个月)。结论开腹手术中超声引导下IRE联合化疗治疗LAPC的安全性和效果较好,但其治疗价值有待前瞻性多中心随机对照临床试验进一步证实。 Objective To examine the safety and clinical efficacy of ultrasound-guided irreversible electroporation(IRE)using the open surgery approach,after induction chemotherapy,in the treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer(LAPC).Methods The data of 64 LAPC patients who underwent ultrasound-guided IRE using the open surgery approach after induction chemotherapy at Department of Pancreatobiliary Surgery,Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from August 2015 to March 2019 were retrospectively analyzed.The study comprised of 30 males and 34 females,with median age of 58.5 years old(range:34 to 87 years old),were included in this study.The tumor was located in the pancreatic head and body/tail in 30 and 34 patients,respectively.The largest recorded tumor size was 6.1 cm(≤4.0 cm:n=35;>4.0 cm:n=29).To create an electric field around the tumor,Two to six probes were parallelly inserted into each patient′s tumor,based on the size of the tumor,at a distance of 2 cm apart through the transverse mesocolon in a caudal-to-cranial direction.According to the numerical sequence of patients undergoing ultrasound-guided IRE,the first 15 cases and following 49 patients were categorized as the primary and secondary treatment group,respectively.T text or χ^2 test was analyzed to the data between two groups.The study endpoints were overall survival(OS)and progression free survival(PFS),which were investigated using Kaplan-Meier method,and their differences were compared using log-rank test.Results The overall length of hospital stay was(8.9±2.7)days(range:5 to 20 days).Four patients were lost to follow-up.The study follow-up rate was 93.8%,with a median follow-up time of 29.3 months(range:13.5 to 55.7 months).The median OS and PFS of the entire cohort was 24.6 months(95%CI:22.0 to 27.3 months)and 12.0 months(95%CI:8.8 to 15.2 months),respectively.One month after IRE,abdominal pain was significantly relieved in 95.3%of the patients(t=-28.55,P<0.01).The rate of complications in the entire cohort was 20.3%and all were classified as grade B.Of them,pancreatic fistula,incisional infection,and upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage were observed in 7,4,and 2 cases,respectively.The rate of complications for patients in the primary and secondary treatment groups were significantly different(10/15 vs.6.1%),respectively(χ^2=26.01,P<0.01).Further,two deaths were observed after IRE in the primary treatment group,while none was observed in the secondary treatment group.Conclusions Ultrasound-guided IRE using the open surgery approach after induction chemotherapy is found to be safe and effective in treating patients with LAPC.However,these findings should be validated in prospective randomized trials before wide clinical application.
作者 李升平 何朝滨 王俊 毛苡泽 劳向明 崔伯康 林小军 Li Shengping;He Chaobin;Wang Jun;Mao Yize;Lao Xiangming;Cui Bokang;Lin Xiaojun(Department of Pancreatobiliary Surgery,Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center,Guangzhou 510060,China)
出处 《中华外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2020年第10期787-792,共6页 Chinese Journal of Surgery
基金 国家重点研发计划(2018YFEO114000) 国家自然科学基金(81972299)。
关键词 胰腺肿瘤 电穿孔 纳米刀 生存分析 预后 Pancreatic neoplasms Electroporation Nano knife Survival analysis Prognosis
作者简介 通信作者:李升平,Email:lishp@sysucc.org.cn。
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献13

  • 1Salem AI, Alfi M, Winslow E, et al. Has survival following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreas adenocarcinoma improved over time? [J]. J Surg 0ncol,2015,112(6) :643-649.
  • 2National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma [ S ]. 2015. http ://www. nccn. org/professionals/physician_gls/f guidelines. asp.
  • 3Yang A,O'Reilly EM. Novel directions in neoadjuvant therapy for pancreas adenocarcinoma [ J ]. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2015,9(5 ) :585-601.
  • 4Verbeke CS, Leitch D, Menon KV, et al. Redefining the R1 resection in pancreatic cancer[ J]. Br J Surg,2006,93 (10) :1232- 1237.
  • 5Walter J, Nier A, Rose T, et al. Palliative partial pancreaticoduodenectomy impairs quality of life compared to bypass surgery in patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head [ J ]. Eur J Surg Oncol,2011,37 (9) :798-804.
  • 6Bailey P, Chang DK, Nones K, et al. Genomic analyses identify molecular subtypes of pancreatic cancer [ J]. Nature, 2016, 531 (7592) :47-52.
  • 7Mahmoud M.Al-Hawary,Isaac R.Francis,Suresh T.Chari,Elliot K.Fishman,David M.Hough,David S.Lu,Michael Macari,Alec J.Megibow,Frank H.Miller,Dushyant V.Sahani,Diane M.Simeone,黄翔,孙灿辉.胰腺导管腺癌放射学报告模板:腹部放射协会和美国胰腺协会的共识声明[J].影像诊断与介入放射学,2014,23(4):350-357. 被引量:60
  • 8胰腺癌诊治指南(2014)[J].中华外科杂志,2014,52(12):881-887. 被引量:65
  • 9杨尹默.胰十二指肠切除术后胰瘘发生危险因素认识及评价[J].中国实用外科杂志,2015,35(8):808-811. 被引量:7
  • 10赵玉沛.重视胰腺癌的多学科诊疗[J].中华外科杂志,2016,54(11):801-803. 被引量:15

共引文献104

同被引文献54

引证文献8

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部