摘要
志怪小说里的怪异现象大多数发生在具体的人世空间,地理可以提供关联丛杂故事的线索。以王同轨的《耳谈类增》与钱希言的《狯园》两部明代小说集为例,两位时代背景相似而地理经验不同的作家的地理意识和地理想象值得进行比较。从全书、一类故事、一个地区、一篇故事或两篇相似的故事这几个层面,用地理分析他们的志怪小说,可以发现其中容易被忽视的含义。
The genre of tales of the strange(zhiguai)sets bizarre and otherworldly events in identfable mundane places.Because of this,geography provides a fruitful way to connect the diverse and fragmentary contents of tale ollctions.This article examines Wang Tonggui's Ertan leizeng(Tales for the Ear,Expanded by Categorics)and Qian Xiyan's Kuai yuan(The Garden of Cunning)The two authors have similar chronological backgrounds but distinct geographic experience,making for a fruitful comparison of their geographic imagination.This article uses geography as tool of analysis of their cllections on several levels:the whole book,one category of stories,a geographic area,a single story,and for comparison of two similar stories.
作者
〔美〕韩瑞亚
Rania Huntington(Department of Asian Languages and Cultures,University of Wisconsin-Madison,Madison,Wisconsin 53706 USA)
出处
《长江学术》
CSSCI
2020年第3期5-18,共14页
Yangtze River Academic
关键词
地理分析
明代小说
《耳谈类增》《狯园》
Geographical Analysis
Tales of Ming Dynasty
Ertan leizeng
Kuai Yuan
作者简介
韩瑞亚(Rania Huntington)(1968-),女,美国人,威斯康星大学麦迪逊分校亚洲语言文化系教授,主要从事中国志怪小说以及家族文学研究。
