中文版数据囤积行为问卷测评大学生群体的信度与效度被引量：18

Revision of the Chinese Version of Digital Hoarding Behaviors Questionnaire

导出

摘要目的:修订中文版数据囤积行为问卷并在中国大学生群体中检验其信效度。方法:采用数据囤积行为问卷、大学生现实囤积行为量表、强迫症状量表及短式抑郁-焦虑-压力量表共对1136名大学生进行施测,4周后对其中的90名大学生进行重测。结果:①验证性因素分析发现,中文版数据囤积行为问卷的两因素模型拟合良好(χ~2/df=3.97,GFI=0.95,CFI=0.96,TLI=0.95,IFI=0.96,NFI=0.96,RFI=0.93,RMSEA=0.08);②中文版数据囤积行为问卷与大学生现实囤积行为量表、强迫症状量表及短式抑郁-焦虑-压力量表均呈显著的正相关(r=0.37~0.61,P<0.01),其组合信度在0.78~0.93之间,平均方差抽取量在0.54~0.65之间;③信度检验发现,中文版数据囤积行为问卷的Cronbach’sα系数在0.80~0.92之间;分半信度在0.67~0.91之间;重测信度在0.77~0.82(P<0.01)之间。结论:中文版数据囤积行为问卷具有良好的信度和效度,可以作为科学的研究工具使用。 Objective: To test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Digital Hoarding Behaviours Questionnaire(C-DHQ). Methods: All 1136 college students were surveyed with Chinese Version of Digital Hoarding Behaviours Questionnaire(C-DHQ), Chinese version of the Saving Inventory-Revised Scale(SI-R), Obsessive-Compulsive Subscale of SCL-90(OCS) and Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21(DAS-21). 90 college students were followed to complete the Chinese version of Digital Hoarding Behaviours Questionnaire 4 weeks later. Results: ①The confirmatory factor analysis showed that the two-factor model fits well(χ~2/df=3.97, GFI=0.95, CFI=0.96, TLI=0.95, IFI=0.96, NFI=0.96, RFI=0.93,RMSEA=0.08). ②The C-DHQ correlated with SI-R,OCS and DAS-21 positively(r=0.37~0.61, P<0.01). In addition, the composite reliability coefficients from 0.78 to 0.93 and AVE coefficients from 0.54 to 0.65 of the C-DHQ. ③The C-DHQ has good internal reliability with Cronbach’s α coefficients from 0.80 to 0.92, re-test reliability coefficients from 0.77 to0.82(P<0.01) and split-half reliability coefficients from 0.67 to 0.91. Conclusion: The Chinese version of Digital Hoarding Behaviours Questionnaire(C-DHQ) has acceptable reliability and validity and can be used to measure digital hoarding behaviors for Chinese college students.

作者郭海辉韦小满赵守盈金童林 GUO Hai-hui;WEI Xiao-man;ZHAO Shou-ying;JIN Tong-lin(National Innovation Center for Assessment of Basic Education Quality,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China;College of Psychology,Guizhou Normal University,Guiyang 550001,China;College of Psychology,Inner Mongolia Normal University,Hohhot 010022,China)

机构地区北京师范大学中国基础教育质量监测协同创新中心贵州师范大学心理学院内蒙古师范大学心理学院

出处《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2020年第3期492-495,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology

基金贵州省科技厅联合项目(黔科合LH字[2015]7780号)的资助。

关键词大学生数据囤积行为信度效度 College Students Digital hoarding behavior Reliability Validity

分类号 R395.1 [医药卫生—医学心理学]

作者简介通讯作者:韦小满,Email:weixiaoman@bnu.edu.cn。

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献2

1唐谭,王建平,唐苏勤,赵丽娜.囤积量表修订版在中国大学生中的修订[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2012,20(1):21-24. 被引量：21
2龚栩,谢熹瑶,徐蕊,罗跃嘉.抑郁-焦虑-压力量表简体中文版(DASS-21)在中国大学生中的测试报告[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2010,18(4):443-446. 被引量：516

二级参考文献40

1陶明,高静芳.修订焦虑自评量表（SAS－CR）的信度及效度[J].中国神经精神疾病杂志,1994,20(5):301-303. 被引量：542
2钟杰,秦漠,蔡文菁,谭洁清,王雨吟,徐晓婧,张昕,刘军.Padua量表在中国大学生人群中的修订[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2006,14(1):1-4. 被引量：28
3Lovibond SH, Lovibond PF. Manual for the depression an- xiety stress scales. Sydney: Psychology Foundation, 1995. 112-115.
4Crawford JR, Henry JD. The depression anxiety stress scales (DASS): Normative data and latent structure in a large non- clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2003, 42:111-131.
5Antony MM, Bieling PJ, Cox BJ, et al. Psychometric properties of the 42-item and 21-item versions of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) in clinical groups and a community sample. Psychological Assessment, 1998, 10: 176- 181.
6Taouk M, Lovibond PF, Laube R. Psychometric properties of a Chinese version of the 21-item depression anxiety stress scales (DASS21). In Report for New South Wales Transcuhural Mental Health Centre. 2001, Cumberland Hospital: Sydney.
7吴明隆.结构方程模型-AMOS的操作与应用.重庆:重庆大学.2009.309-323.
8Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH. The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) with the beck depression and anxiety inentories. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1995, 33:335-343.
9Henry JD, Crawford JR. The 21-item version of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS-21): Normative data and psychometric evaluation in a large non-clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2005, 44:227-239.
10Kimberly RZ. Psychometric properties of internet admin- istered versions of Penn state worry questionnaire (PSWQ) and depression, anxiety, and stress scale (DASS). Computers in Human Behavior, 2009, (25): 841-843.