摘要
随着风险社会的来临,科技探索中经济价值和潜在风险之间的矛盾冲突愈发显现。以人工智能为代表的科技异化风险引发的刑法讨论层出不穷,呼吁刑法通过扩大犯罪圈进行规制的呼声也越来越强烈。受制于科技试验的两面性,我们对科技风险的规制,只能以规范和风险分摊为限度。科技试验和刑法介入的天然对立使得刑法无力也无法承担公众期待,甚至可能带来刑法僭越界限的更大隐患。技术规范的先行介入和完善显然对于风险的防控更为直接有效,配合建立和规范以行业自律、行政支撑、政策引导、刑法兜底的责任分摊体系才是缓解社会焦虑的关键。
With the advent of risk society,the contradictions between economic value and potential risk in technology exploration are becoming more and more apparent.The criminal law discussions triggered by the risksharing of alienation of science and technology represented by artificial intelligence are endless,and the calls for criminal law to regulate through the expansion of criminal circles are becoming more and more intense.Subject to the two-sidedness of technology testing,our regulation of technology risks can only be limited by norms and risks.The natural opposition between the science and technology experiment and the criminal law intervention also makes the criminal law be powerless and unable to bear the public expectation,even brings greater hidden dangers caused by the criminal law.The prior intervention and improvement of technical specifications is obviously more direct and effective for the prevention and control of risks and the key to alleviate social anxiety is to establish and standardize the responsibility sharing system based on industry self-discipline,administrative support,policy guidance,and criminal law.
作者
张学文
Zhang Xuewen(Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China)
出处
《贵州警察学院学报》
2020年第1期54-62,128,共10页
Journal of Guizhou Police College
基金
国家社会科学基金项目(17XFX009)
西南政法大学科研创新项目(FXY2019073)。
关键词
科技试验
科技风险
刑法介入
风险分摊
science and technology experiment
science and technology risk
criminal law intervention
risk sharing
作者简介
张学文(1995-),男,山东日照人,西南政法大学青少年犯罪中心助理研究员,法学硕士。
