摘要
伪善是生活世界中常见的道德现象,它的本质是伪装的“善”。黑格尔在《法哲学原理》中对伪善问题进行了详尽研究。黑格尔从世界的终极目的“善”切入,展示了“善—义务—良心—伪善”严密的逻辑理路。由此,黑格尔提出伪善的三种哲学形态:“盖然论”“抽象的善”“讽刺”。当然,这三种伪善形态并不是平行铺陈的,而是根据其隐蔽性由低级形态向高级形态依次递增。另外,在“文明对话”的宏观视野中,将黑格尔的伪善与儒家的乡愿进行比较后可发现,儒家的乡愿类似于黑格尔的“抽象的善”。黑格尔的贡献在于揭示了伪善的潜藏性,而儒家则集中于经验地分析伪善者。将黑格尔的伪善与儒家的乡愿结合起来考察,既有利于深入溯源伪善现象之滥觞,又能深刻地把握伪善对社会道德氛围与良善风气的破坏。
Hypocrisy is a common moral phenomenon in life,and its essence is the disguised"goodness".Hegel makes a detailed study on hypocrisy in Principles of Legal Philosophy.Hegel begins this research from the ultimate goal of the world"goodness"and demonstrates the strict logical approach:"goodness-obligation-conscience-hypocrisy".Thus,Hegel proposes three philosophical forms of hypocrisy:"probabilism","abstract goodness"and"satire".Of course,these three hypocritical forms are not parallel-spreading,instead they are ascending from the low-level to the high-level according to their concealment degrees.In addition,in the macroscopic view of"dialogue of civilizations",it is found that Confucian hypocrite is similar to Hegel's"abstract goodness"by comparing Hegel's hypocrisy with Confucian hypocrite.Hegel's contribution is to reveal the concealment of hypocrisy,while Confucianism focuses on the empirical analysis of hypocrites.Combining Hegel's hypocrisy with Confucian hypocrite is not only helpful to tracing the origin of hypocrisy,but also beneficial to thoroughly grasping the destruction of hypocrisy to social moral atmosphere and good manners.
作者
沈宝钢
SHEN Baogang(School of Humanities,Southeast University,Nanjing Jiangsu 211189,China)
出处
《江苏科技大学学报（社会科学版）》
2020年第1期29-35,共7页
Journal of Jiangsu University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)
关键词
黑格尔
伪善
儒家
乡愿
Hegel
hypocrisy
the Confucian school
Confucian hypocrite
作者简介
沈宝钢(1994-),男,江苏泰州人,东南大学博士研究生,主要从事中西方传统伦理思想研究。
