期刊文献+

中日OFDI逆向技术溢出的比较研究--基于OFDI发展进程视角

Comparative Study on Spillover of OFDI Reverse Technology between China and Japan:Development Process Perspective Based on OFDI
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文从OFDI的发展进程视角入手,考察中日两国OFDI逆向技术溢出效应。在总结大国OFDI发展的一般规律的基础上,通过统计分析对中日OFDI发展进程进行合理的阶段性划分,结果表明:中日的对外投资发展历程符合世界投资大国的一般发展规律,两国的OFDI发展进程既存在显著差异性和也存在较多的相似性,其相似性主要体现在整体的阶段性递增趋势。此外,日本近几十年的OFDI发展已经由不成熟走入了相对成熟的阶段,走出了一条相对成功的对外投资发展路径,而中国的OFDI也呈现由调整过渡阶段向相对成熟阶段转变的趋势;因此,建立和完善支持企业对外直接投资的制度和政策体系,对于我国稳步实施“走出去”战略和提高对外直接投资的经济绩效具有重要意义。 From the perspective of the development process of OFDI,this paper investigates the spillover effect of OFDI reverse technology in China and Japan.OFDI on powers,on the basis of general law of the development of the development process through the statistical analysis of sino-japanese OFDI reasonable piles,and the results show that the china-japan foreign investment development conforms to world powers of the general law of development,the two countries OFDI development process there are significant differences and there are more similarity,the similarity in the phases of the overall trend of increasing.In addition,in recent decades,the development of OFDI in Japan has gone from immaturity to relative maturity,and developed a relatively successful development path of outbound investment,while China's OFDI has also shown a trend of transition from adjustment to relative maturity.Therefore,it is of great significance for China to steadily implement the strategy of"going out"and improve the economic performance of ofdi to establish and perfect the system and policy system supporting OFDI.
作者 景光正 Jing Guangzheng(School of Economics,Nankai University,Tianjin 300071,China)
出处 《未来与发展》 2020年第2期58-62,共5页 Future and Development
关键词 OFDI 逆向技术溢出 发展进程 OFDI reverse technology overflow the development process
作者简介 景光正,南开大学经济学院国际经济研究所博士研究生,研究方向:国际经济学。
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献86

  • 1阎大颖.制度距离、国际经验与中国企业海外并购的成败问题研究[J].南开经济研究,2011(5):75-97. 被引量:122
  • 2赵伟,古广东,何元庆.外向FDI与中国技术进步:机理分析与尝试性实证[J].管理世界,2006,22(7):53-60. 被引量:369
  • 3Amiti, M. , and J. Konings, "Trade Liberalization, Intermediate Inputs, and Productivity: Evi- dence from Indonesia", American Economic Review 2007, 97 (5), 1611--1638.
  • 4Arnold, J. , "Productivity Estimation at the Plant Level: A Practical Guide", Mimeo, Bocconi Uni- versity, 2005.
  • 5Cai, H. , and Q. Liu, "Competition and Corporate Tax Avoidance: Evidence from Chinese Indus- trial Firms", Economic Journal, 2009, 119 (537), 764--795.
  • 6Damijan, J. , S. Polanec, and J. Prasnikar, "Outward FDI and Productivity: Micro-evidence from Slovenia", World Economy, 2007, 30(1), 135-155.
  • 7Eaton, J. , S. Kortum, and F. Kramarz, "Dissecting Trade: Firms, Industries, and Export Desti- nations", American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 2004, 94(2), 150--154.
  • 8Feenstra, R. , Z. Li, and M. Yu, "Exports and Credit Constraints under Incomplete Information: Theory and Evidence from China", Mimeo, University of California, Davis, 2011.
  • 9Felipe, J. , R. Hasan, and J. McCombie, "Correcting for Biases When Estimating Production Functions: An Illusion of the Laws of Algebra?" CAMA Working Paper Series, No. 14, Australia National University, 2004.
  • 10Foster, L. , J. Haltiwanger, and C. Syverson, "Reailocation, Firm Turnover, and Efficiency: Se lection on Productivity or Profitablity?" American Economic Review, 2008, 98(1), 394--425.

共引文献701

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部