摘要
旧题扬雄所作《蜀都赋》的真伪向有争议,文学辨伪常用的研判手段并不足以得出铁证。其实文本背后隐含的作者的观念与思想,更堪为确定作品真正时代之法门。自史学维度考察,该赋中“王基既夷,蜀侯尚丛”的祖源传说,实出于晋代常璩对蜀人先祖谱系的整合与重构,不当为西汉子云所知;以哲学角度探论,赋言“坤宫奠位”所依据的“九宫八卦”理论,乃基于后学对扬雄等人所持“四卦-四时”卦气论的发展,故不应是扬雄所具备的认知。通过多维的综合考察,可定所谓“扬雄《蜀都赋》”为托名之作,并反思文学辨伪的方法与实践。
Much controversy over the authenticity of Yang Hsiung’s Shu Du Fu((Fu(descriptive prose interspersed with verse)to the Capital of Shu Kingdom))continues to exist,as the commonly used literary methods did not produce sufficient evidence.An examination of the views and thoughts the author implied in the text is a sure perspective to determine when the writing was done.From the perspective of history,linguistic evidences prove the ancestral origins about Wang Ji are an integration and reconstruction of different ancestral lineages by Chang Qu in the Jin Dynasties.Philosophically,the theory of Nine Palaces in the Western Han Dynasty is the development of relevant concepts in later generations.Therefore,Yang Hsiung was not the author of Shu Du Fu.This study can serve as a case to rethink the methods and practice of literary examination.
作者
陶禹
TAO Yu(Department of History,Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou,Guangdong,510275)
出处
《新疆大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2020年第2期87-93,共7页
Journal of Xinjiang University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
关键词
扬雄
蜀都赋
辨伪
祖源传说
卦气说
Yang Hsiung
Shu Du Fu
Examination
Legend of Ancestral Origins
作者简介
陶禹(1989-),男,内蒙古乌兰察布人,文学博士,中山大学历史学系博士后,从事汉魏六朝文史研究。
