摘要
在国际上,越来越多的法院超出本国法域认定标准必要专利许可的地域范围是全球性的。英国高等法院审理的无线星球诉华为案是此类判决的典型代表之一。综合该案及其他类似案件的裁判结论可知,司法机关确实无法协调、引导争议双方就许可的地域范围达成一致时,需要考量双方的经营范围、谈判过程、专利劫持与反向劫持情况、效率原则和商业惯例等因素作出判决。标准必要专利权利人所主张的全球性专利组合许可可能构成搭售或捆绑销售,应当允许实施人在标准必要专利许可使用纠纷中提出竞争法抗辩。
An increasing number of courts in the world decided beyond national jurisdiction that the geographical scope of license is global.Unwired Planet v.Huawei is one of representatives of such cases.It shows that certain factors will be considered when a court has to recognizes which geographical scope of license is FRAND.Those include but not limited to business scope of SEP holders and implementers,negotiation procedures,hold-up and hold-out,efficiency as well as commercial practice.The proposal for a worldwide SEP portfolio license is likely to constitute the tying in SEPs and non-SEP,or multi-jurisdictional bundling.It is necessary to allow SEP implementers to raise defenses based on competition law in the disputes on SEP license.
作者
郑悦迪
ZHENG Yuedi(University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing 102488,China)
出处
《渭南师范学院学报》
2020年第1期62-68,共7页
Journal of Weinan Normal University
关键词
标准必要专利
许可
地域范围
司法认定
全球性
standard essential patents
license
geographical scope
judicial recognition
worldwide
作者简介
郑悦迪(1989—),女,北京人,中国社会科学院大学博士研究生,主要从事知识产权法研究。
