摘要
作为解决民事"执行难"的重要方式,执行和解被寄予了诸多理想价值。然而,执行和解的实践效果却远未实现立法者的期待。之所以出现这种困境,除执行和解协议天然地具有不确定风险性和被执行人诚信意识的缺失外,更为主要的原因是法院能动性发挥的不适当与不充分。将能动司法的理念引入执行和解具有现实的合理性与必要性。这就要求法院在执行和解中的能动作为既不能缺位也不能过线,如此执行和解才能真正发挥其应有的作用。
As an important way to solve the problem of civil "difficulty in execution", conciliation of execution has been placed in many ideal values. However, the implementation of the practical effect of reconciliation is far from achieving the expectations of legislators. In addition to the uncertainty risk and the lack of the good faith consciousness of the party, the main reason for this dilemma is the improper and insufficient exertion of the court’s initiative. It is reasonable and necessary to introduce the concept of active justice into the implementation of conciliation. This requires the court in the implementation of reconciliation can not be absent and can not cross the line, so that the implementation of reconciliation can really play its due role.
作者
周星星
ZHOU Xing-xing(Law School,Xiangtan University,Xiangtan,Hunan 411105)
出处
《牡丹江大学学报》
2019年第7期90-93,共4页
Journal of Mudanjiang University
关键词
能动司法
执行和解
执行调解
active administration of justice
perform reconciliation
perform mediation
作者简介
周星星(1996-),男,山西吕梁人,湘潭大学法学院硕士在读研究生,研究方向:民事诉讼法。
