摘要
台湾20世纪90年代以来对日据历史的重评浪潮,对皇民化运动时期文学的态度打破了以往的批判思维,开始强调对其宽容和谅解。陈芳明也提出以"皇民化文学"代替"皇民文学"的观点。但回到作品中,皇民文学到底是不是一种热烈拥抱皇民化政策的文学现象呢?对于皇民化运动的不同态度,展现了彼时知识分子的不同选择,也说明对这一文学现象的评价不能一概而论。
Since the 1990s,Taiwan has experienced a wave of reassessment of its history under the Japanese occupation,in which the attitude towards literature in the period of Kominka Movement has broken with the past critical thinking as it began laying emphasis on tolerance and understanding.Chen Fang-ming has also proposed that‘Kominka literature’be replaced with the‘Kominkaized literature’.However,when we return to the works,is Kominka literature,after all,a literary phenomenon that shows a passion for embracing Kominka policies?Different attitudes towards the Kominka Movement reveal different choices made by the then intellectuals and they also demonstrate that commentaries on this literary phenomenon cannot be simply generalized.
出处
《华文文学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第2期74-80,共7页
Literatures in Chinese
关键词
日据历史重评
皇民化运动
陈芳明
皇民化文学
Reassessment of(Taiwan’s)history during Japanese occupation
the Kominka Movement
Chen Fang-ming,Kominka literature
