摘要
公司法的自由主义赋予拖带权以良好的制度空间,拖带权亦给予创业企业家与风险投资资本家以矛盾调和手段。拖带权条款通过触发事件等要素,规制权利义务当事人与转让对象的程序要件,着力于风险投资资本家的投资收益与创业企业家的利益衡平。域外诸如美国、澳大利亚、英国、墨西哥等国家的法律条文并无限制拖带权条款的表述,亦以司法判例形式肯定了拖带权条款的效力。仅从我国法条理论层面,亦未限制拖带权条款的合法性,但就我国司法层面语境下拖带权条款的合法性判定、违约责任的承担、赋予强制履行的程度等方面,仍要求对拖带权的条款要素设置、法律制度安排的完善进行更全面对比探讨,从而优化我国法语境下的拖带权条款的适用环境。
The liberalism of company law gives drag-along rights a good system space,and the drag-along right gives the entrepreneur and the venture capitalist conflicts coordination methods.Through the factors like touch-off events,the drag-along right clause regulates the procedure qualifications of the parties to the rights and obligations and transfer objects,focusing on the balance between venture capitalists’investment income and entrepreneurs’profit.Foreign countries such as America,Australia,Mexico,etc.do not limit the terms of the drag-along rights,and their judicial precedent affirms the effect of the drag-along rights.In terms of legality judgment,liability of breach of contract and degree of compulsory fulfillment in the context of our country’s judicial level still requires more comprehensive contrast and discussion on factors set-up of drag-along clause and perfection of legal system arrangement.Thus the applicable environment of the drag-along rights in the context of Chinese law can be optimized.
出处
《淮北职业技术学院学报》
2018年第2期16-19,共4页
Journal of Huaibei Vocational and Technical College
关键词
拖带权
优先股
风险投资
创业企业
企业法
公司法
drag-along rights
preferred stock
venture investment
venture enterprise
enterprise law
corporation law
作者简介
庞天红(1993—),女,北京人,法律(非法学)专业2015级硕士研究生,研究方向:金融法规。
