期刊文献+

英国秘密情报向诉讼证据转化制度研究 被引量:8

Research on the System of Conversion from Closed Material to Procedural Evidence in U.K.
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的/意义]在情报诉讼功能日益凸显的当前社会,深入研究英国秘密情报向诉讼证据转化制度,对于提升恐怖主义及其关联犯罪追诉能力及被告权利保障水平有着重要的意义。[方法/过程]以英国法律、判例和研究文献为基础,运用规范分析、文献分析等方法,对英国秘密情报向诉讼证据转化制度的产生、发展及其内容进行深入研究。[结果/结论]提出英国秘密情报向诉讼证据转化制度及其扩展适用存在诸多争议,但符合公正审判的基本要求。该制度在英国的实践运作及其引致的争议为世界其他国家和地区相关制度构建提供丰富的养分。 [Purpose/Significance]The litigation function of intelligence has become increasingly prominent in current society.So indepth study of conversion from closed material to procedural evidence in U.K.is of great significance for promoting terrorism and related criminal prosecution and the level of defendant rights protection.[Method/Process]On the basis of U.K.law,precedents and research literature,this paper makes a deep study of the emergence,development and system content of the conversion from closed material to procedural evidence transformation in U.K.by means of normative analysis and literature analysis.[Result/Conclusion]We can conclude that there is a lot of controversy about this system and its extension,but it is in line with the basic requirements of fair trial.The practice of this system and its resulting disputes provide abundant nutrients for the construction of relevant systems in other countries and regions of the world.
作者 吴常青 吴轩 李晨蕾 Wu Changqing;Wu Xuan;Li Chenlei(Tianjin University of Commerce,Tianjin300134;First Branch of the People's Procuratorate of Tianjin,Tianjin300101;Railway Transportation Procuratorate of Tianjin,Tianjin 300142)
出处 《情报杂志》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第2期24-29,共6页 Journal of Intelligence
基金 天津市哲学社会科学规划项目"国家安全法治化视域下情报监控规制研究"(编号:TJFX17-006)
关键词 秘密情报 证据 特别律师 公正审判 closed material evidence special advocate air trial
作者简介 吴常青(ORCID:0000-0003-3064-9292),男,1979年生,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,研究方向:刑事司法;吴轩(ORCID:0000-0001-8432-1933),男,1987年生,助理检察员;;李晨蕾(ORCID:0000-0002-1401-3617),女,1984年生,检察员。
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献45

  • 1戚建刚.后“9·11”时代德国反恐法律制度之改革[J].欧洲研究,2007,25(4):135-148. 被引量:16
  • 2Paul M. Schwarz, "German and U.S Telecommunications P-rivacy Law : Legal Regulation of Domestic Law Enforcement Surveillance", 54 Hastings L.J 751,783,791,2003.
  • 3李震山.德国抗制恐怖主义法制与基本权利保障[J].月旦法学杂志(台湾地区),2006(4):7.
  • 4Antoine Garapon, "The oak and the reed: counter-terrorism mechanisms in France and the United States of America", 27 Cardozo L. Rev.2041, 2062(2006).
  • 5Joint Committee on Human Rights:Counter-Terrorism Policy and Human Rights: Prosecution and Pre-Charge Detention, 24th report of session 2005-2006.
  • 6HC Deb, 10 July 2006, col. 1117.
  • 7John Ip. "The rise and spread of the special advocate", UKPL,Win,717,719,741(2008).
  • 8Chahal v. United Kingdom (1997)23 E.H.R.R. 413. at 131, 144.
  • 9Terrorism act 2000 Sch.3 paras 5 (4) (b) and 7; ATCSA Sch.6 paras 5 and 6.
  • 10M. Redmayne, "Disclosure and its Discontents", Crim. L. R. 441,455(2004) .

共引文献16

同被引文献93

引证文献8

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部