摘要
目前,对于知识产权有效性争议能否提交仲裁,是一个存在争议的问题。随着争议事项可仲裁性范围的进一步扩大,可仲裁事项与公共政策的脱离,知识产权有效性争议的可仲裁性正被一些国家所接受。应当在解决行政机关公权力与非公力救济方式仲裁裁决之间的矛盾基础上,允许仲裁庭在一定条件下对知识产权效力作出裁决。仲裁裁决只在当事人之间有效,而且仲裁庭不宜直接作出知识产权无效的裁决,当出现知识产权明显无效情形时,可以采用权利不得滥用原则裁决权利人不得行使权利。
At present,it is an arguable question whether a dispute from the intellectual property validity should be attended to arbitration.As the arbitral disputes differ from the public policy,the intellectual property validity will be accepted into arbitral in many countries.It is permissible that the arbitral tribunal makes a decision upon the intellectual property validity under some conditions,based on solution of the conflict between the public authority of the administrative agency and the non- governmental arbitral tribinal.The arbitral tribinal go to effect among the parties,and the arbitration tribunal should not make a decision denying the validity of the intellectual property.When the intellectual property appears apparently invalid,they should arbitrate that the person who has the right should not exercise the right under the principle“Anyone cannot abuse his right”.
出处
《仲裁研究》
2007年第2期19-25,共7页
Arbitration Study
关键词
知识产权
有效性争议
可仲裁性
Intellectual Property
the Validity disputes
Arbitrability
