摘要
香港回归后,香港法院不能以1958年《纽约公约》为依据执行内地裁决,导致两地仲裁裁决相互执行受阻。随着2000年《关于内地与香港特区相互执行仲裁裁决的安排》的签署,内地与香港相互执行仲裁裁决逐渐步入正轨。本文通过对比两地仲裁法对裁决执行的不同规定,结合香港法院执行内地裁决的司法实践,力图揭示《关于内地与香港特区相互执行仲裁裁决的安排》体制下,香港法院执行内地仲裁裁决中所面临的法律问题,包括对内地裁决、公约裁决、公共政策的界定以及香港《仲裁条例》相关条款的适用问题。
After the return of sovereignty of Hong Kong in 1997,Hong Kong Court could not enforce the Mainland awards in accordance with New York Convention.This re- sulted in the stoppage of mutual enforcement of arbitration awards in Mainland and HKSAR.With the signing of'The Arrangement Concerning Mutual Enforcement of Arbi- tral Awards Between the Mainland and the Hong Kong SAR',the mutual enforcement has finally come to the right track.The article gives a comparison of the differences of the ar- bitration laws between the Mainland and HKSAR and reviews the potential problems in en- forcing the Mainland awards,such as the interpretation of Mainland awards,Convention awards and public policy,the implementation of the relevant articles of the Arbitration Or- dinance of HKSAR.
出处
《武大国际法评论》
2006年第2期344-358,共15页
Wuhan University International Law Review
