新时代高校“形势与政策”课师生共同体重构研究被引量：1

A Study on the Reconstruction of the Teacher-student Community in the Course of “Situation and Policy” in Colleges and Universities in the New Era

在线阅读下载PDF

导出

摘要 "形势与政策"课是改进与加强大学生思想政治教育工作的主渠道与主阵地。进入新时代面临新形势,形势与政策教育仍存在诸多亟待解决的问题,其中多维"异化"的"形势与政策"课师生主体现状,已成为提升形势与政策教育实效的主要掣肘。基于对当下高校"形势与政策"课教学情境中师生双主体的反思,务必革新"形势与政策"课教学理念,力求学生主体消解异化现象和教师主体复归本位角色,教师与学生双主体凝聚合力,建构具有建设性意义和形态的"形势与政策"课师生共同体,以期提升"形势与政策"课教学实效。 The course of ＂situation and policy ＂is the main channel and position to improve and strengthen the ideological and political education of college students. The new era is facing the new situation,situation and policy education still has many problems to be solved,especially multidimensional＂alienation＂lesson of＂situation and policy＂subject status between teachers and students become the main constraint of improving the effect of situation and policy education. Based on the respection of teachers and students＇ double-Subject under the teaching situation of ＂Situation and policy＂,it is important to innovation ＂situation and policy＂teaching ideas,strive to students main body eliminate dissimilation phenomenon and the teachers＇ role is returned home,the teachers and students the double main body social,construct constructive meaning and form the lesson ＂situation and policy＂community of teachers and students,in order to improve effect of ＂situation and policy＂teaching.

作者张赛玉 ZHANG Saiyu(Institute of Marxism,Minjiang University,Fuzhou,Fujian 350108,China)

机构地区闽江学院马克思主义学院

出处《闽江学院学报》 2018年第4期103-108,共6页 Journal of Minjiang University

关键词 “形势与政策”课程异化师生共同体新时代 ＂situation and policy＂ course alienation community of teachers and students new era

分类号 G642.3 [文化科学—高等教育学]

作者简介张赛玉（1981-），女，福建永泰人，讲师，博士，主要从事思想政治教育理论与实践研究。

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献3

1龚放.大学“师生共同体”：概念辨析与现实重构[J].中国高教研究,2016,0(12):6-10. 被引量：84
2余丽.论教师自主的内涵和结构[J].全球教育展望,2013,42(12):68-74. 被引量：12
3雷娜,左鹏.新中国成立以来高校“形势与政策”课的历史沿革与建设经验[J].思想教育研究,2017(2):79-83. 被引量：5

二级参考文献27

1徐廷福.论教师专业自主权的个体实现[J].教师教育研究,2005,17(6):24-27. 被引量：7
2Gilroy,D. P. (1991). The loss of professional autonomy: The relevance of Olga Matyash' s paper to the brave new world of British education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 17 ( 1 ), 1 - 15.
3Rodgers D. B., Leslie A. L. (2002), Tension, Struggle, Growth, Change: Autonomy in Education [J]. Childhood Education, 78 (5) : 301--302.
4Anderson, D. R. ( 2002 ). Creative teachers : risk, responsibility, and love. Journal of Education, 183 ( 1 ), 33 - 48.
5Helsby,G. (1995). Teachers' Construction of professionalism in England in the 1990s. Journal of Educa- tion for Teaching,21 ( 3 ) ,317 - 332.
6Graham,K. C. (1996). Running ahead: enhancing teacher commitment. Journal of Physical Education, 67(1),45 -48.
7Benson, P. (2000) Autonomy as Learners and Teachers Right [ A] In B. Sinclair et al. (eds) Leamer Au- tonomy, Teacher Autonomy: Future Directions [ C] . London: Longman, 111 - 117.
8Kreis, K. & Brockopp,D. Y. (2001). Autonomy: a component of teacher job satisfaction. Education,107 (1) ,110- 115.
9Little, D. (1995). Learning as Dialogue: The Dependence of Learner Autonomy on Teacher Autonomy. System, 23 (2) : 175 - 182.
10Lamb, T. E. (2000a). Finding a voice: Learner autonomy and teacher education in an urban context. In Sinclair et al. (eds.) , 118 - 127.