期刊文献+

内镜黏膜下剥离术和切除术对早期上消化道肿瘤的疗效比较 被引量:25

Comparison of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Resection for Early Digestive Ttract Neoplasms
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨内镜黏膜下剥离术和切除术治疗早期上消化道肿瘤的临床效果。方法将早期上消化道肿瘤患者186例作为研究对象,按照患者入院顺序和相关手术指征分为研究组102例,对照组84例,研究组患者行内镜下黏膜切除术(EMR),对照组患者给予内镜下粘膜剥离术(ESD),观察两组患者的临床疗效。结果研究组患者完全切除率为91. 18%(93/102),对照组为96. 43%,差异具有统计学意义(P <0. 05);研究组患者出血、穿孔并发症发生率为15. 69%(16/102),与对照组16. 67%(14/84)比较,差异不显著(P> 0. 05);研究组患者随访6个月复发率为2. 94%(3/102),与对照组2. 38%(2/84)比较差异不显著(P> 0. 05),两组患者住院时间比较差异不显著(P> 0. 05)。结论内镜下粘膜切除术和粘膜剥离术均是治疗早期上消化道肿瘤的有效方法,疗效可靠,安全性高,可在临床范围内推广使用。 Objective To investigate the clinical effect of endoscopic submucosal dissection and resection in the treatment of early digestive tract tumors. Methods 186 cases of early gastrointestinal cancer patients as the research object,according to the order of admission of patients and surgical indications were divided into the study group of 102 cases,84 cases in the control group,patients in the study group were treated with endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR),the control group were treated with endoscopic.Submucosal dissection(ESD) treatment,observe the clinical efficacy of the 2 groups. Results In the tudy group,complete resection rate was 91.18%(93/102),the control group was 96.43%,the difference was statistically significant( P〈0.05); in the study group,hemorrhage and perforation complication rate was 15.69%(16/102),and 16.67% in the control group(14/84),the difference was not significant( P〉0.05);In the study group,6 month,recurrence rate was 2.94%(3/102),and 2.38% in the control group(2/84).There was no significant difference( P〉0.05),hospitalized time of the 2 groups.Had no significant difference( P〉0.05). Conclusion EMR and ESD are effective methods for early stage of upper gastrointestinal tract.The curative effect is reliable and safe.It can be widely used in clinical practice.
作者 薛麟 华鹏 高原 XUE Lin;HUA Peng;GAO Yuan(Ankang Central Hospital,Ankang,72500)
出处 《实用癌症杂志》 2018年第10期1690-1692,共3页 The Practical Journal of Cancer
关键词 早期上消化道肿瘤 内镜下黏膜剥离术 内镜下黏膜切除术 Early digestive tract tumor Endoscopic submucosal dissection Endoscopic mucosal resection
作者简介 通讯作者:高原
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献49

  • 1Kazuya Akahoshi,Masafumi Oya.Gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the stomach:How to manage?[J].World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy,2010,2(8):271-277. 被引量:16
  • 2Panagiotis Tsibouris,Chissostomos Kalantzis,Periklis Apostolopoulos,Antonios Zalonis,Peter Edward Thomas Isaacs,Mark Hendrickse,Georgios Alexandrakis.Small bowel ulcerative lesions are common in elderly NSAIDs users with peptic ulcer bleeding[J].World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy,2014,6(12):612-619. 被引量:6
  • 3周平红,姚礼庆,徐美东,钟芸诗,陈巍峰,秦新裕.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗大肠巨大平坦息肉18例分析[J].中国实用外科杂志,2007,27(8):633-636. 被引量:35
  • 4周平红,姚礼庆,徐美东,陈巍峰,钟芸诗,马黎丽,张轶群,秦新裕.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗消化道黏膜下肿瘤[J].中国微创外科杂志,2007,7(11):1063-1065. 被引量:62
  • 5Wang M,Xu J,Zhang Y,et al.Gastrointestinal stromal tumor:15-years'experience in a single center[J].BMC Surg,2014;14(1):93.
  • 6Wen J,Linghu E,Yang Y,et al.Relevant risk factors and prognostic impact of positive resection margins after endoscopic submucosal dissection of superficial esophageal squamous cell neoplasia[J].Surg Endosc,2014;28(5):1653-9.
  • 7Edge SB,Byrd DR,Compton CC,et al.AJCC cancer staging manual[M].7th ed.New York:Springer Verlag,2010.
  • 8Toyonaga T,Man-i M,East JE,et al.1,635 Endoscopic submucosal dissection cases in the esophagus,stomach,and colorectum:complication rates and long-term outcomes[J].Surg Endosc,2013;27(3):1000-8.
  • 9Kiriyama S, Saito Y, Yamamoto S, et al. Comparison of endoscopic submucosal dissection with laparoscopic-assisted eolorectal surgery for early-stage colorectal cancer: a retrospective analysis [ J]. Endoscopy, 2012 ;44( 11 ) :1024-30.
  • 10Ono S,Fujishiro M,Niimi K,et al.Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal squamous cell neoplasms[J].Gastrointest Endosc,2009;70(5):860-6.

共引文献136

同被引文献230

二级引证文献92

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部