摘要
版权法保护技术措施的正当性在于维护权利人在版权法中的正当利益,即从他人对作品的使用中获得合理回报。如果权利人设置技术措施的作用在于阻止他人对作品进行不损害其在版权法中正当利益的使用,那么权利人希望借助版权法对技术措施的保护去禁止他人对该技术措施的规避,就属于对技术措施的滥用。借助技术措施进行捆绑销售和划分销售市场是典型的滥用行为。即使该技术措施兼具防止版权侵权或防止在未付费的情况下使用作品的功能,版权法也不应对其提供保护。因此,我国应当在修订《著作权法》时,将任何与实现权利人在版权法中正当利益无关的技术措施排除出保护范围。
The justification for the copyright law to protect technological measures is to safeguard copyright owners＇ legitimate interests recognized by the copyright law,i. e.,to receive financial benefit from others＇ exploitation of the works. When the technological measures employed by the copyright owner is to prevent others from using the work in a way that does not impair the legitimate interests recognized by the copyright law,the copyright owner＇s act to prohibit others from circumventing that technological measure is the abuse of the technological measure. The typical abuse acts include restricting the use of goods or services in relation to the machine or device and controlling geographic market segmentation by technological measure. Such a technological measure should not be protected by the copyright law even if it is also able to prevent copyright infringement or unauthorized access of the work without proper payment. China Copyright Law should be revised to exclude those technological measures from the protection that are not designed to protect copyright owners＇ legitimate interests recognized by the copyright law.
作者
王迁
WANG Qian(Law School,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042,China)
出处
《现代法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第4期52-73,共22页
Modern Law Science
基金
2015年国家社会科学基金重大项目"互联网领域知识产权重大立法问题研究"(14ZDC020)
关键词
技术措施
接触控制措施
版权保护措施
滥用技术措施
technological measures
access control measure
copyright protection measure
abuse of technological measure
作者简介
王迁（1975），男，上海人，华东政法大学教授，博士生导师，法学博士。
