期刊文献+

美国对华“301调查”与我国的反制研究 被引量:4

Studies on the America's “301 Investigation” against China and Countermeasures against It
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 2017年8月美国发起对我国的"301调查",意味着沉寂多年的"301条款"再次浮出水面。2018年4月,特朗普政府根据"301调查"报告宣布对我国产品加征关税,更是充分暴露出美国政府试图动用单边措施以挑战国际贸易秩序的本质。"301条款"的启动以及惩罚性关税的施加使得中美贸易摩擦呈现出白热化的迹象,目前我国应该首先力求基于世贸组织框架,采取多边手段化解本轮中美贸易摩擦,坚决反对在国际贸易争端中采取单边措施。其次,我国也应深刻认识到中美贸易摩擦的根源,在未来积极谋划、合理布局,依托"一带一路",构建属于我国的新型贸易关系。 In August 2017, the United States launched the "301 investigation" on China, which means the 301 clause that has been quiet for many years surfaces again. In April 2018, the Trump administra tion announced an increase in tariffs on China-s products based on the 301 investigation report, which fully demonstrates the essence of the U. S. government's attempt to use unilateral measures to chal lenge the international trade order. The start of the 301 investigation and the application of punitive tar iffs have made the trade frictions between China and the United States become more and more fierce. At present, China should strive to adopt multilateral approaches based on the WTO framework to re solve this round of Sino-US trade frictions and firmly oppose the adoption of unilateral measures in in ternational trade disputes. Second, China should also deeply understand the root causes of the trade friction between China and the United States. In the future, China shall actively plan and rationalize its distribution, and rely on the "The Belt and Road" strategy to build a new type of trade relationship.
作者 林胥宇 Lin Xuyu(International Law School,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 20004)
出处 《上海市经济管理干部学院学报》 2018年第4期24-31,共8页 Journal of Shanghai Economic Management College
关键词 “301条款”中美贸易摩擦“301调查”关税 "301 investigations" Sino-U. S. trade frictions WTO framework new type of trade relations
作者简介 林胥宇(1993-),男,四川省成都人,华东政法大学国际经济法学院硕士研究生在读,研究方向:国际经济法。
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献83

  • 1郭雳.美国“301条款”与WTO争端解决机制的互动及其前景预测[J].中国法学,2001(5):145-151. 被引量:24
  • 2中国商务部网站.“每日商情”2003年9月5日.
  • 3.《与贸易有关的知识产权协议》[M].,..
  • 4Judith H. Bello & Alan F. Holmer, The Post - Uruguay Round Future of the Section 301, Law and Policy in International Business, p. 1305 (1994).
  • 5Bruce E. Clubb, United States Foreign Trade Law, Volume 1, p. 232 - 233 (1991) .
  • 6John H. Jackson, Restructuring the GATT System, p. 64 (1990).
  • 7Staffan Burenstam Linder, The Pacific Century (Stanford, Calif. : Stanford University Press, 1986).
  • 8Richard O. Cunningham, Dispute Settlement in the WTO: Did We Get What the United States Need, or Did We Give Up the Only Remedy that Really Worked? Practicing Law Institute, p. 566 (1995).
  • 9See supra note 25, Judith H. Bello & Alan F. Holmer.
  • 10Article 22 "Compensation and the Supervision of Concessions", DSU.

引证文献4

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部