期刊文献+

基于窗口DEA和Malmquist指数的我国上市航空公司运营效率评价 被引量:20

Operational Efficiency Evaluation of China’s Listed Airlines Based on Window-DEA and Malmquist Index
原文传递
导出
摘要 运用窗F/DEA模型计算和比较我国6家上市航空公司2012~2016年的相对运营效率值,进行全要素综合评价,并利用Malmquist指数模型对6家航空公司5年间的效率变化进行动态分析,将Malmquist指数分解为技术效率变动(EC)和技术变动指数(TC)分析上市航空公司效率变化的原因.研究结果表明:6家上市航空公司运营效率参差不齐,采用单一机型低成本运营的春秋航空效率最高且保持稳定,东航相对效率平均值最低且稳定性较差;研究期内航空公司全要素生产率整体呈上升趋势,但受宏观经济环境影响有所波动;各公司技术水平均有进步,技术效率变动不大. The paper evaluated the total factor productivity of China's 6 listed airlines comprehensively from 2012 to 2016 by calculating and comparing the relative operational efficiency using Window-DEA model. Malmquist Index model was also used to analyze the dynamic efficiency changes of the airlines during the 5 years. Malmquist Index (MI) was then decomposed to efficiency change (EC) and technical change (TC) to find the reasons for efficiency changes. The results indicated that the efficiency of 6 airlines differed over the study period As a low-cost carrier operating with single fleet, Spring Airlines established the highest and most stable efficiency while China Eastern displayed the lowest and unstable efficiency relatively. Overall, the average total factor productivity (TFP) increased along the time and fluctuated due to the influence of macro-economic environment changes. The technique of all airlines improved while the technical efficiency change was not significant.
作者 王雪 张培文 汪瑜 WANG Xue;ZHANG Pei-wen;WANG Yu(Airport and Transportation Management School, Civil Aviation Flight University of China, Guanghan 618307 China)
出处 《数学的实践与认识》 北大核心 2018年第11期73-80,共8页 Mathematics in Practice and Theory
基金 国家自然科学基金(U1733127)
关键词 航空运输 效率评价 窗口DEA 上市航空公司 MALMQUIST指数 air transportation efficiency evaluation window-dea listed airlines malmquistindex
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献110

  • 1余波.中国内地航空公司产出的有效性研究[J].南京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版),2004,6(3):25-28. 被引量:4
  • 2尹希果,陈刚,付翔.环保投资运行效率的评价与实证研究[J].当代财经,2005(7):89-92. 被引量:30
  • 3董兵,唐应辉.DEA方法及其在深沪两市民航企业经营效率评价中的应用[J].中国民航飞行学院学报,2006,17(2):18-20. 被引量:5
  • 4Good D,Nadiri I,Roeller L,et al. Airline eficiency diferences between europe and the US: implications for the pace of EC integration and domestic regulation. European Journal of Operational Research,2005 ; 8(4) :508-518.
  • 5Charnes A, Cooper W W, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 1987;2(6) :429-444.
  • 6Yao Chen. Ranking efficient units in DEA. The International Journal of Management Science ,2004 ;32:213-219.
  • 7邓超,袁倩.基于动态DEA模型的证券投资基金绩效评价[J].系统工程,2007,25(1):111-117. 被引量:28
  • 8Abramovitz, M. , 1993, “The Search for the Sources of Growth: Area of Ignorance, Old and New”, Journal of Economic History, 53 (June) : 217-243.
  • 9Bhagwati, J., 1996, The Miracle That Did Happen: Understanding East Asia in Comparative Perspective, Keynote Speech Delivered at Cornell University on the Occasion of Conference on Government and Market: The Relevance of the Taiwan Residents Performance to Development Theory and Policy in honor of Professor Liu and Tsiang.
  • 10Baumol, W.J., 1967, Business Behavior, Value and Growth, Rev. Ed. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

共引文献415

同被引文献136

引证文献20

二级引证文献55

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部